Re: [Jsonpath] JSONPath WG next steps
Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Thu, 24 December 2020 12:32 UTC
Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5C0E3A1209 for <jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Dec 2020 04:32:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZFWxrGWh7ABZ for <jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Dec 2020 04:32:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D6E73A1208 for <jsonpath@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Dec 2020 04:32:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1608813120; bh=bWa6Y25jioiqXLR3AvL3ISaghzdM4p3+Xb8f3pZu75c=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=I7g4n7F7gdH/RX6D7vbiZRGjLGM2C+CxVZzwNalGJIgAM/KfHVRYLWei2qMppGrA0 3oNnWgy/P8e2ABUKnzfqtSEcf7uEP8YCHrShCHLHGuG3MYcFAPyyfemqSiV0RbNjsJ jKk50C3lvtNGelHx30lK95OsjijeZcBoanAieY9g=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([84.171.158.45]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M2wL0-1ktViW1LeG-003M4D for <jsonpath@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Dec 2020 13:32:00 +0100
To: jsonpath@ietf.org
References: <CAHBU6isXOWxuNT2_kdo_ZBoqJpTyt59W+0-FMmjRvbPGLhNWNA@mail.gmail.com> <00da063e49dd4ba176651eb5b52b01bbf18522ac.camel@gmail.com> <86F20551-0819-4D0E-B987-5B2D39CE86CF@tzi.org> <CAHBU6itytz9zvgSm2NJO_9PwGUV6pNOujOK54r4tXX9wXGu8WA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <f8570d92-1924-9282-a3b2-f17234c6a4c2@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 13:31:57 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHBU6itytz9zvgSm2NJO_9PwGUV6pNOujOK54r4tXX9wXGu8WA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:TpfIO6i33bMQXZ/tL21akb2LGKkj1d3qGE78Z5LThYrz/co/g1H LrcktPAsVtkXOfDflpwah/hkUdbQEHhY3G1pgeIG4c2IhWMWf6Ge3ql/1iBVnnllkgspqbg 20xvmOujnvugsAsEv/J5IIocbXwPTx+yrYlmrzPpudqXltQBVqcElgC1aqw8aZWvTLj3huT XlSprHM1SqXZLlOoSR56A==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:HdXgq7AZ7DM=:4kt1Zpq0C9HpD/qCt5ShvU x+ty5NWy3woC+Nv5MbEYcAXBrQtusw4Q8hN8BtENZtr0vYDP/JoGT+vKhuC/rSuOi5t0wGrgh Yv5bkkscbhKhMDTei18UU9kj8T3CBmz9+rEWm1RqBK5e9jc8nVlt5kSexM/220hmVIHbr3mCJ 7fDLoebKZNqwq8JDex53ioQ9dkxrjaz5a/yJaS8kNxjjEUeuDjSEpHAlliRnZ+f59vZ/bGXxY vxF/f5WEiZEZgJbEQnLmcARIMUfGNvu+tdWGS0yu2NBpnVDwYtUVfzfS7OfhrHP6Fq+bbystS i+Zxt9ssCbxtthGIvIVMEc6LewH+jeECda591gcDgAKUPx+K2ywcwtZ+GWUoqTfHpFI/jXs6P FAXOIkiNLrbE//zV2joDElHgLUWflYnw1oktuo7BBHsYddqG7D2Nw6/SfPeheISFZIF5v1ATQ EzhvR1TRakaEya8w6YQ+xCvQdXVlHlMWeZZ8II3U/yI0X9MQODTlGmhValyYZKs4jhzmxHX2b 9+EuL3saMzZtAVg4m0FuIWAx6WqAe+ctxCeItnIYNqNuVMIXR7iLveI12etxp3mmdzkL4d4d5 Xygq52tpmzWMBkuggElvusTdp2bncauXQG+jOAHNf9WNjwLn0J4g0CTS8Ed7gNKKTRJY0R9UT qbmgm0+KEVHc9AmQrR1ou/gtxtI4Jo+8T+gva6OAxT/XwFQcmGPzdieawcjBKpvqCHQ9M8A9T gsl5lFDMfpo7acoRSPVw/3gBmVDoXrOofmfIEo1AgBhbK/tvfsl+gX2gsjhSV8RTtJpcfUgPT N1cjBSiTtaLS24j9S7W8CANj+Nu2QumSKWwchLDxuVQogtSa5tcBlgetpe0HYNYZza+f+V1C7 yfBXq00El7jmYfFoK2FA==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jsonpath/R6u5jn6K9l_PRpQcryf-HpL1P0g>
Subject: Re: [Jsonpath] JSONPath WG next steps
X-BeenThere: jsonpath@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A summary description of the list to be included in the table on this page <jsonpath.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jsonpath>, <mailto:jsonpath-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jsonpath/>
List-Post: <mailto:jsonpath@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jsonpath-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonpath>, <mailto:jsonpath-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 12:32:04 -0000
Am 24.12.2020 um 08:51 schrieb Tim Bray: > Hmm, draft-ietf-jsonpath-00 certainly wouldn't offend me, but on the > other hand there's a lot to be said for sticking to conventions. I'm > imagining someone writing a bot to plow through WG drafts and relying on > the convention. I've added Murray to the "To" line to see if he has an > opinion. James? Anyone else? > ... Just lookes at <https://www.ietf.org/standards/ids/guidelines/#7> and found it to be not that helpful (yes, sent mail reporting the brokenness). Anyway: I believe sticking with the naming convention is more important than avoiding "stutter". Best regards, Julian
- [Jsonpath] JSONPath WG next steps Tim Bray
- Re: [Jsonpath] JSONPath WG next steps Tim Bray
- Re: [Jsonpath] JSONPath WG next steps Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Jsonpath] JSONPath WG next steps Glyn Normington
- Re: [Jsonpath] JSONPath WG next steps Tim Bray
- Re: [Jsonpath] JSONPath WG next steps Julian Reschke
- Re: [Jsonpath] JSONPath WG next steps Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Jsonpath] JSONPath WG next steps Stefan Hagen
- Re: [Jsonpath] JSONPath WG next steps Glyn Normington