IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Jsonpath] June interim meeting

Stefan Gössner <stefan@goessner.net> Mon, 14 June 2021 09:12 UTC

Return-Path: <stefan@goessner.net>
X-Original-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BF833A1CAF for <jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 02:12:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kfNARHgvVXDK for <jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 02:12:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [217.72.192.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 763753A1CAE for <jsonpath@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 02:12:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([87.123.195.221]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue109 [212.227.15.183]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M89P3-1lwHH1110N-005LRA; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 11:12:16 +0200
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, jsonpath@ietf.org
References: <CAHBU6iuJr5Z-r0ZT_qwj=Si_oOGUuY_4g7qshuoBQwG0zBCshg@mail.gmail.com> <5f257963-74a1-26a6-413a-ce9e16292180@goessner.net> <970DDA69-9558-4FF6-8E59-F4F4E325B930@tzi.org> <fe4c342f-c25f-7226-2c85-49cb45ff6910@goessner.net> <79797F7C-F4D6-4D65-92D0-0FA79069D47F@tzi.org>
From: Stefan Gössner <stefan@goessner.net>
Message-ID: <6ed5a0eb-b815-9035-d669-4290112c266a@goessner.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 11:12:14 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <79797F7C-F4D6-4D65-92D0-0FA79069D47F@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:z3QOj4r93sYHB6soVLnQSG+6d1F5QCe7hUaBy9RZPkS3jf8LvlK 14XD7xWGT2y/aAQNo1HP8lGOT874c0oDbhSipH/R22YR9Gc1xKWoW8fpGeErUNmKx7oMvKy fwyTMExjkPG7itt3ByVigoQhwmNQ1byXRu0gha4VZVBsVl7Onp0ZlMU1SMW61wq2Oqeb8zF ckIdbwS4H7IoEa4kZMyog==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:S+izxlWAI5U=:9oacv0KWF3vzqZz1QAzeey ZBhj8KPwx/EIm+1cPE0asWVUEDJ7Mnv4gUPEA8Sz9ZYrQ5YRQK8Ru5T6xB4TTyWodavkv/aM0 spSpOyAHqoLGT7bfSb4eMoAvyshPeSpD7M2i9ICgBuR5o92nIsPkZSnNHodvNQ4xtwoAD3cyS ogD0Eh0PyxqYcBUuVtaVRqBVrJvs1rSVd/9qnFfI8hffBbfffsEX7f0D/x43VcuUxyf4MqAlb MlKGxRnBWleJPLL58MbvVVZEPmjz0JUzYhMcpaBH7oXUwIaOhOF0V+tqtAWa3Bu3SyMXmzqx7 EXzTdgNkGo75vi4VQaFd5PoVX3HZd2FsCbSawpFwwNXSf9WDWp/9tQkIX8ZzC8tnHION0tw/q LdP8y59skhmDX3Z1qmchzKdtZdxddYszcFP8/AgJk8ooY3AeXhU9lrdBSHlHFlYACMl8EV0X5 DABVhgwK0FDoa+WvOTVPF7dlgLJZL31CisDqRacGhXzrNVza7ocLOIeiz7qB7dNSXMZ1Bp6D4 W7CzSjHyKk/j8dkH7jBlJs=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jsonpath/YCFBMFxKRxzQn4TcDAs9lmzddt4>
Subject: Re: [Jsonpath] June interim meeting
X-BeenThere: jsonpath@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A summary description of the list to be included in the table on this page <jsonpath.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jsonpath>, <mailto:jsonpath-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jsonpath/>
List-Post: <mailto:jsonpath@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jsonpath-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonpath>, <mailto:jsonpath-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 09:12:38 -0000

separating expression language from its usage in selectors is a good idea.
--
sg


Am 14.06.2021 um 11:04 schrieb Carsten Bormann:
> On 2021-06-14, at 10:53, Stefan Gössner <stefan@goessner.net> wrote:
>> * What's the opinion about support of arithmetic operators in filter expressions?
> Indeed.
> I already had that on slide 9, so I didn’t add a slide (but I of course could).
>
> Obviously, slide 13 to 19 are still placeholders; I plan to fill in some of the discussion in #98 if there is any.
>
> I think the underlying problem (and solution) is that we need to clearly separate the expression language from the way it is used in the selectors; that will clean up both and be simpler to work with.
>
> Grüße, Carsten
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email