Re: [Justfont] Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-justfont-toplevel-02.txt

[Wendy Seltzer <[e-mail]>]

Thanks Chris and Martin,

On 05/09/2016 01:49 PM, Chris Lilley wrote:
> 
> 
> On 16/05/09 03:45, Martin J. Dürst wrote:
>>
>> - The start of section 7 introduces @font-face format identifiers. It
>> uses the word "defined" for these, but only talks about the types
>> defined in the document itself. This raises the following questions:
>>   - Are registrations of new subtypes supposed to give this
>>     information, too? If yes, who is responsible to avoid conflicts?
>>     (we could just ask IANA to check that the identifier doesn't clash
>>      with that of another subtype)
>>   - Will a future version of css-fonts-3 reference the IANA registry
>>     for these values, or how will potential discrepancies be solved?
>>   - If the information in css-fonts-3 is supposed to be normative, and
>>     the information in the IANA registry just informative, then
>>     clearly say so in the draft.
> 
> This is a very good point. I have opened an issue
> https://github.com/svgeesus/ietf-justfont/issues/14
> 
> This requires discussion, as there are several options and it is not
> immediately clear which is best.

Maybe you could spark that discussion with a proposed way to resolve the
issue?

Thanks,
--Wendy

-- 
Wendy Seltzer -- [e-mail] +1.617.715.4883 (office)
Policy Counsel and Domain Lead, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
https://wendy.seltzer.org/        +1.617.863.0613 (mobile)