Re: [Jwt-reg-review] [IANA #1188061] expert review for draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response (jwt)

John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com> Wed, 03 February 2021 00:50 UTC

Return-Path: <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
X-Original-To: jwt-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jwt-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2DBC3A110E for <jwt-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 16:50:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ve7jtb-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wNu33uhtqN91 for <jwt-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 16:50:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb2e.google.com (mail-yb1-xb2e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C2293A110D for <jwt-reg-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 16:50:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb2e.google.com with SMTP id i6so15953235ybq.5 for <jwt-reg-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 16:50:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ve7jtb-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=C1JFXoFhhhLaS9U5FE/VEGqB9yZZ0O/6VkzMxmeH5WE=; b=hLG9dXmfh4FYbt0uup+05zAPHm5RX5qcExHqykJYpDfqyUZc79c1ISQ8+xlSbg61Ia RSvcM/WVfDqV8iWBKOxHpgGear388q8jNQQrWrkmq+4oczBxFXa8zPEOQK4Lao4kOey3 j90eqW1cyWrcV/5VLEuT/yRZQsmqPuuLddz77BuciTMNByVxct1t2QT/5mAvFaw1txDy VEpVfEhFsJ3lVCr6/W6NV+8mSMxBklyM0p2NmpiAa7qCAqR60MNEwgVez5PcL2rWZoje NKc5WwDsuiFIwnrWdhO4F+l0lO9FThuLhKZl0KwIIJE+0ScdcYJTcrmMhgUN2J5cLNnT QXdQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=C1JFXoFhhhLaS9U5FE/VEGqB9yZZ0O/6VkzMxmeH5WE=; b=gCGo3hWH75ggBG7jAE9RQBXqyiyDjI2TaXXTcDwVC/oZ8fKSOrBtR1cNxnv381fPrv KoSKnApLGh+iIuc+5SARbro+V6jR4E8UjmUHcbaS7Ow2f3ttgpxOzEY+qJAkq4tRBrwt 13UhSWnx7+Eil4CGqH3nhcqfOszqN6/GIQgXR8sYNtIPQszAgJlHbgBuhobAZlibTWbH 8wzVkt0t3RQW5AOiT8LM0nRL6bpCsOlGafF9u9rjJVcB2BeFYPntCmpuPFOh3jiLhskU kSThV55sMf2f3b5D5JodcLyb+XY4CMNv5cXwaM/rSTzhWy0Od/lguAadiWI325NNVKk+ NfpQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530mk3aP0u8Mylqz8S397kjaA6vf/DY2LGRWy7xlIx2nmKsZxp6p qFuXz+TrDPtPCNqKpVuS9lDAAnXWOjVJtCKWH2ytYg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzWsXppOb1t6uInDRvoTGr5usBD/2izSFkobSefRnhhGS/gf0qCrVIIBARSvchRp332fRfM3eVY1Umh/V6YtH0=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:2f4f:: with SMTP id v76mr781053ybv.391.1612313426346; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 16:50:26 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <RT-Ticket-1188061@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-19460-1611856553-1010.1188061-37-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-9150-1612313156-830.1188061-37-0@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <rt-4.4.3-9150-1612313156-830.1188061-37-0@icann.org>
From: John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 21:52:38 -0300
Message-ID: <CAANoGhKet8zaH1rKpUQd4ByqtkgUtnin9tmTRofEbbisZK9H2w@mail.gmail.com>
To: drafts-expert-review@iana.org
Cc: Michael Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>, jwt-reg-review@ietf.org, jbradley@me.com, chuck.mortimore@visa.com, bcampbell@pingidentity.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000b5bc205ba63f9d1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jwt-reg-review/10b4G6zridmVAZJHKoE90UOdHQE>
Subject: Re: [Jwt-reg-review] [IANA #1188061] expert review for draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response (jwt)
X-BeenThere: jwt-reg-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Expert review of proposed IANA registrations for JSON Web Token \(JWT\) claims." <jwt-reg-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jwt-reg-review>, <mailto:jwt-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jwt-reg-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:jwt-reg-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jwt-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jwt-reg-review>, <mailto:jwt-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2021 00:50:30 -0000

I will see if I can reach him.   He is dealing with family medical things I
think.

On Tue, Feb 2, 2021, 9:45 PM Amanda Baber via RT <
drafts-expert-review@iana.org> wrote:

> Given that this document is on Thursday's telechat agenda, should we mark
> this document "IANA OK" if we don't hear back from Mike by the end of
> Wednesday?
>
> thanks,
> Amanda
>
> On Fri Jan 29 02:34:55 2021, chuck.mortimore@visa.com wrote:
> > Agreed - looks fine to me.
> >
> > Thanks all
> > ________________________________
> > From: Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2021 3:48 PM
> > To: John Bradley <jbradley@me.com>
> > Cc: drafts-expert-review@iana.org <drafts-expert-review@iana.org>;
> > John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>; Mortimore, Chuck
> > <chuck.mortimore@visa.com>; Michael.Jones@microsoft.com
> > <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>; jwt-reg-review@ietf.org <jwt-reg-
> > review@ietf.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Jwt-reg-review] [IANA #1188061] expert review for draft-
> > ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response (jwt)
> >
> > I concur with John.
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021, 4:36 PM John Bradley
> > <jbradley@me.com<mailto:jbradley@me.com>> wrote:
> > The registration looks fine to me.  I approve.
> >
> > On 1/28/2021 3:00 PM, Amanda Baber via RT wrote:
> > > John, Brian, Mike, Chuck,
> > >
> > > As the designated experts for JSON Web Token Claims, can you review
> > > the registration request in Section 11.4.1 of draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-
> > > introspection-response?
> > >
> > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-
> > > response-10#section-
> > > 11.4<
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftools.ietf.org%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-
> > > ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response-10%23section-
> > > 11.4&data=04%7C01%7Cchuck.mortimore%40visa.com
> %7C3b594d1fb9bb46a3c56408d8c3e74b5b%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C637474745459450259%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=PwM2P5eiXcsF2f40Zk60uB%2Bkl65V5A1TH7wBsA4qILs%3D&reserved=0>
> > >
> > > This document is listed on the 2/4 IESG telechat. Is it possible to
> > > review this by 2/3?
> > >
> > > Let us know if, after reviewing this, you believe that no further
> > > expert reviews are necessary for this registration.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Amanda Baber
> > > Lead IANA Services Specialist
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Jwt-reg-review mailing list
> > > Jwt-reg-review@ietf.org<mailto:Jwt-reg-review@ietf.org>
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jwt-reg-
> > > review<
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fjwt-
> > > reg-
> > > review&data=04%7C01%7Cchuck.mortimore%40visa.com
> %7C3b594d1fb9bb46a3c56408d8c3e74b5b%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C637474745459450259%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=ISg4pIFmRMK0n5tu451dYgYHvNSntBSi0xTV1ihdLZ8%3D&reserved=0>
> >
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and
> > privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any
> > review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly
> > prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please
> > notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any
> > file attachments from your computer. Thank you.
>