[Jwt-reg-review] [IANA #1188061] expert review for draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response (jwt)

Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-expert-review@iana.org> Thu, 28 January 2021 18:00 UTC

Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: jwt-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jwt-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CC473A0C32 for <jwt-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 10:00:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.648
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.648 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1Xl1Zm6yeA-t for <jwt-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 10:00:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.lax.icann.org (smtp.lax.icann.org [192.0.33.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88CDD3A0C2A for <jwt-reg-review@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 10:00:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from request4.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 665DBE085A; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 18:00:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by request4.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 63FDC2043B; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 18:00:45 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: amanda.baber
From: Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-expert-review@iana.org>
Reply-To: drafts-expert-review@iana.org
In-Reply-To: <rt-4.4.3-19460-1611856553-1010.1188061-37-0@icann.org>
References: <RT-Ticket-1188061@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-19460-1611856553-1010.1188061-37-0@icann.org>
Message-ID: <rt-4.4.3-16034-1611856845-804.1188061-37-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #1188061
X-Managed-BY: RT 4.4.3 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: amanda.baber@icann.org
CC: jwt-reg-review@ietf.org, ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com, bcampbell@pingidentity.com, Michael.Jones@microsoft.com, chuck.mortimore@visa.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 18:00:45 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jwt-reg-review/8gU_bYADo5dl-jRJsy4TBB5Svvo>
Subject: [Jwt-reg-review] [IANA #1188061] expert review for draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response (jwt)
X-BeenThere: jwt-reg-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "Expert review of proposed IANA registrations for JSON Web Token \(JWT\) claims." <jwt-reg-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jwt-reg-review>, <mailto:jwt-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jwt-reg-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:jwt-reg-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jwt-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jwt-reg-review>, <mailto:jwt-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 18:00:47 -0000

John, Brian, Mike, Chuck, 

As the designated experts for JSON Web Token Claims, can you review the registration request in Section 11.4.1 of draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response?

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response-10#section-11.4

This document is listed on the 2/4 IESG telechat. Is it possible to review this by 2/3?

Let us know if, after reviewing this, you believe that no further expert reviews are necessary for this registration.

Best regards,

Amanda Baber
Lead IANA Services Specialist