Re: [Jwt-reg-review] [Ace] Requested review for IANA registration in draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params

[Brian Campbell <[e-mail]>]

That  "rs_cnf" claim registration request in 9.1 points to 3.3 which says
it has 'the same syntax and semantics as defined in for the "rs_cnf"
parameter', which I think is in 4.1. And 4.1 says that the "rs_cnf" values
'follow the syntax of the "cnf" claim from section 3.1 of
[I-D.ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession].' Similar to other comments I've
made today, I don't follow what that would mean for the value of the claim
when it's a JWT. And that seems like something that's important to
understand for the purpose of a JWT claims registry request.


On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 4:11 AM Ludwig Seitz <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hello JWT registry reviewers,
>
> the IESG-designated experts for the JWT claims registry have asked me to
> send a review request to you about the "rs_cnf" claim registered here:
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params-07#section-9.1
>
> Thank you in advance for you review comments.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ludwig
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ace mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
>

-- 
_CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged 
material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, 
distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited.  If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately 
by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from your 
computer. Thank you._