Re: [Jwt-reg-review] [IANA #1188061] expert review for draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response (jwt)

[Mike Jones <[e-mail]>]

I approve of this registration.

                                                          -- Mike

From: John Bradley <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 4:53 PM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: Mike Jones <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [IANA #1188061] expert review for draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response (jwt)

I will see if I can reach him.   He is dealing with family medical things I think.

On Tue, Feb 2, 2021, 9:45 PM Amanda Baber via RT <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
Given that this document is on Thursday's telechat agenda, should we mark this document "IANA OK" if we don't hear back from Mike by the end of Wednesday?

thanks,
Amanda

On Fri Jan 29 02:34:55 2021, [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]> wrote:
> Agreed - looks fine to me.
>
> Thanks all
> ________________________________
> From: Brian Campbell <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
> Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2021 3:48 PM
> To: John Bradley <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
> Cc: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]> <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>;
> John Bradley <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>; Mortimore, Chuck
> <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>; [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
> <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>; [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]> <jwt-reg-
> [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
> Subject: Re: [Jwt-reg-review] [IANA #1188061] expert review for draft-
> ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response (jwt)
>
> I concur with John.
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021, 4:36 PM John Bradley
> <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]><mailto:[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>> wrote:
> The registration looks fine to me.  I approve.
>
> On 1/28/2021 3:00 PM, Amanda Baber via RT wrote:
> > John, Brian, Mike, Chuck,
> >
> > As the designated experts for JSON Web Token Claims, can you review
> > the registration request in Section 11.4.1 of draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-
> > introspection-response?
> >
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-
> > response-10#section-
> > 11.4<https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftools.ietf.org%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-
> > ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response-10%23section-
> > 11.4&data=04%7C01%7Cchuck.mortimore%40visa.com<http://40visa.com>%7C3b594d1fb9bb46a3c56408d8c3e74b5b%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C637474745459450259%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=PwM2P5eiXcsF2f40Zk60uB%2Bkl65V5A1TH7wBsA4qILs%3D&reserved=0>
> >
> > This document is listed on the 2/4 IESG telechat. Is it possible to
> > review this by 2/3?
> >
> > Let us know if, after reviewing this, you believe that no further
> > expert reviews are necessary for this registration.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Amanda Baber
> > Lead IANA Services Specialist
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Jwt-reg-review mailing list
> > [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]><mailto:[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jwt-reg-
> > review<https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fjwt-
> > reg-
> > review&data=04%7C01%7Cchuck.mortimore%40visa.com<http://40visa.com>%7C3b594d1fb9bb46a3c56408d8c3e74b5b%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C637474745459450259%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=ISg4pIFmRMK0n5tu451dYgYHvNSntBSi0xTV1ihdLZ8%3D&reserved=0>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and
> privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any
> review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly
> prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please
> notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any
> file attachments from your computer. Thank you.