IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Jwt-reg-review] [IANA #1189514] expert review for draft-ietf-cdni-uri-signing (jwt)

Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org> Wed, 24 February 2021 03:48 UTC

Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: jwt-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jwt-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4123C3A091F for <jwt-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 19:48:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.627
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.627 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NBQu8cnGu3Gi for <jwt-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 19:47:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.lax.icann.org (smtp.lax.icann.org [IPv6:2620:0:2d0:201::1:81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C58843A091C for <jwt-reg-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 19:47:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from request4.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C65E1DC9; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 03:47:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by request4.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 818AF204A7; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 03:47:58 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: sabrina.tanamal
From: Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org>
Reply-To: drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org
In-Reply-To: <rt-4.4.3-11624-1613774786-333.1189514-9-0@icann.org>
References: <RT-Ticket-1189514@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-24342-1613758666-198.1189514-9-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-32142-1613758933-1041.1189514-9-0@icann.org> <CA+k3eCQmFVhOt03ohZkf5jbq1DByJAhTdSWW20ws3DBEK1Qcww@mail.gmail.com> <rt-4.4.3-11584-1613772444-1782.1189514-9-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-11624-1613774786-333.1189514-9-0@icann.org>
Message-ID: <rt-4.4.3-24854-1614138478-1634.1189514-9-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #1189514
X-Managed-BY: RT 4.4.3 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: amanda.baber@icann.org
CC: ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com, michael.jones@microsoft.com, jwt-reg-review@ietf.org, drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org, chuck.mortimore@visa.com, bcampbell@pingidentity.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 03:47:58 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jwt-reg-review/boO8OLUduBG-IT_uK0daLBN55YM>
Subject: [Jwt-reg-review] [IANA #1189514] expert review for draft-ietf-cdni-uri-signing (jwt)
X-BeenThere: jwt-reg-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "Expert review of proposed IANA registrations for JSON Web Token \(JWT\) claims." <jwt-reg-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jwt-reg-review>, <mailto:jwt-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jwt-reg-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:jwt-reg-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jwt-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jwt-reg-review>, <mailto:jwt-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 03:48:00 -0000

Hi all,

Is it possible to review these registration requests before Thursday? The document's listed on Thursday's IESG telechat agenda.

thanks,

Amanda Baber
Lead IANA Services Specialist

On Fri Feb 19 22:46:26 2021, sabrina.tanamal wrote:
> Hi Brian, all,
> 
> Sorry about that! You're correct; we need your approval for the
> registrations in Section 6.6 of draft-ietf-cdni-uri-signing.
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cdni-uri-signing/
> 
> Thanks for the quick review.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Sabrina Tanamal
> Senior IANA Services Specialist
> 
> On Fri Feb 19 22:07:24 2021, bcampbell@pingidentity.com wrote:
> > Hi Sabrina,
> >
> > The subject of the email indicates draft-ietf-cdni-uri-signing but
> > the
> > content of the message has draft-ietf-oauth-access-token-jwt. The
> > latter
> > was already reviewed by this group a week or so ago:
> > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jwt-reg-
> > review/jVKsOSG8QagS3Z2N28Mn6w8bOOY/
> >
> > I'm guessing this was just a copy/paste mishap and the review request
> > here
> > is actually for
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-cdni-uri-signing-21#section-
> > 6.6? If
> > so, I do approve of those registration requests.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Brian
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 11:22 AM Sabrina Tanamal via RT <
> > drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org> wrote:
> >
> > > John, Brian, Mike, Chuck,
> > >
> > > As the designated experts for JSON Web Token Claims, can you review
> > > the
> > > registrations in Section 7.2 of draft-ietf-oauth-access-token-jwt?
> > >
> > >
> > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-access-token-jwt-
> > > 11#section-7.2
> > >
> > > If you're the first expert to submit a review, please let us know
> > > whether
> > > you want us to wait for all reviewers to respond before we mark the
> > > document "IANA OK" (or send your comments to the authors, if the
> > > registrations are not OK).
> > >
> > > The deadline for reviews would be March 12th, according to RFC
> > > 7519.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Sabrina Tanamal
> > > Senior IANA Services Specialist
> > >

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email