[Jwt-reg-review] [IANA #1189514] expert review for draft-ietf-cdni-uri-signing (jwt)

Sabrina Tanamal via RT <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org> Fri, 19 February 2021 22:46 UTC

Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: jwt-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jwt-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC4EA3A0CF0 for <jwt-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 14:46:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.628
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.628 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZUXEcaybhPME for <jwt-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 14:46:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.lax.icann.org (smtp.lax.icann.org [IPv6:2620:0:2d0:201::1:81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96EC93A0D29 for <jwt-reg-review@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 14:46:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from request4.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24DEBE0659; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 22:46:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by request4.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 232C5207F9; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 22:46:26 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: sabrina.tanamal
From: Sabrina Tanamal via RT <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org>
Reply-To: drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org
In-Reply-To: <rt-4.4.3-11584-1613772444-1782.1189514-9-0@icann.org>
References: <RT-Ticket-1189514@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-24342-1613758666-198.1189514-9-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-32142-1613758933-1041.1189514-9-0@icann.org> <CA+k3eCQmFVhOt03ohZkf5jbq1DByJAhTdSWW20ws3DBEK1Qcww@mail.gmail.com> <rt-4.4.3-11584-1613772444-1782.1189514-9-0@icann.org>
Message-ID: <rt-4.4.3-11624-1613774786-1054.1189514-9-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #1189514
X-Managed-BY: RT 4.4.3 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: sabrina.tanamal@icann.org
CC: jwt-reg-review@ietf.org, ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com, michael.jones@microsoft.com, chuck.mortimore@visa.com, bcampbell@pingidentity.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 22:46:26 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jwt-reg-review/mlBDTsQt6dJw88Wb_OLdy73pqvc>
Subject: [Jwt-reg-review] [IANA #1189514] expert review for draft-ietf-cdni-uri-signing (jwt)
X-BeenThere: jwt-reg-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "Expert review of proposed IANA registrations for JSON Web Token \(JWT\) claims." <jwt-reg-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jwt-reg-review>, <mailto:jwt-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jwt-reg-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:jwt-reg-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jwt-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jwt-reg-review>, <mailto:jwt-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 22:46:35 -0000

Hi Brian, all,

Sorry about that! You're correct; we need your approval for the registrations in Section 6.6 of draft-ietf-cdni-uri-signing. 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cdni-uri-signing/

Thanks for the quick review. 

Best regards,

Sabrina Tanamal
Senior IANA Services Specialist

On Fri Feb 19 22:07:24 2021, bcampbell@pingidentity.com wrote:
> Hi Sabrina,
> 
> The subject of the email indicates draft-ietf-cdni-uri-signing but the
> content of the message has draft-ietf-oauth-access-token-jwt. The
> latter
> was already reviewed by this group a week or so ago:
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jwt-reg-
> review/jVKsOSG8QagS3Z2N28Mn6w8bOOY/
> 
> I'm guessing this was just a copy/paste mishap and the review request
> here
> is actually for
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-cdni-uri-signing-21#section-
> 6.6? If
> so, I do approve of those registration requests.
> 
> Thanks,
> Brian
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 11:22 AM Sabrina Tanamal via RT <
> drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org> wrote:
> 
> > John, Brian, Mike, Chuck,
> >
> > As the designated experts for JSON Web Token Claims, can you review
> > the
> > registrations in Section 7.2 of draft-ietf-oauth-access-token-jwt?
> >
> >
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-access-token-jwt-
> > 11#section-7.2
> >
> > If you're the first expert to submit a review, please let us know
> > whether
> > you want us to wait for all reviewers to respond before we mark the
> > document "IANA OK" (or send your comments to the authors, if the
> > registrations are not OK).
> >
> > The deadline for reviews would be March 12th, according to RFC 7519.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Sabrina Tanamal
> > Senior IANA Services Specialist
> >