Re: [Jwt-reg-review] Seeking resolution to undetermined registration request

Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> Fri, 06 September 2019 21:00 UTC

Return-Path: <rdd@cert.org>
X-Original-To: jwt-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jwt-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AEE6120DF2; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 14:00:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EtV2BgXWWQ4B; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 14:00:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from veto.sei.cmu.edu (veto.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE0C1120DE8; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 14:00:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from delp.sei.cmu.edu (delp.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.31]) by veto.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x86L0ZiX000525; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 17:00:35 -0400
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 veto.sei.cmu.edu x86L0ZiX000525
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cert.org; s=yc2bmwvrj62m; t=1567803635; bh=GjjN8lFRZLLEpftBcjrraDjliQsYgTasbF66ZoZyxuc=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=OziOyUC+Xfa+4JQoaDgVpoaszb7Ity8PAx09NXFC+vRZI1FETUabVlYDqzcspOfNI JQthDhtKRpCxz0YJlIc5L6Rk52SjTwGMYLIbIyPfO5l+Pd65kT0oh3DzB2EcsIiIuX LDh5QojvHH6A5m+wxQXapHXDWaFbe660NubdGlSk=
Received: from CASSINA.ad.sei.cmu.edu (cassina.ad.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.28.249]) by delp.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x86L0XVi036140; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 17:00:33 -0400
Received: from MARATHON.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.250]) by CASSINA.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.249]) with mapi id 14.03.0468.000; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 17:00:33 -0400
From: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
To: Brian Campbell <bcampbell=40pingidentity.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>
CC: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "jwt-reg-review@ietf.org" <jwt-reg-review@ietf.org>, "drafts-expert-review@iana.org" <drafts-expert-review@iana.org>
Thread-Topic: [Jwt-reg-review] Seeking resolution to undetermined registration request
Thread-Index: AQHVZCVp9ViUTL+ZpkKiuZlGTkrQEqcejSKAgAC4pAD//910UA==
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 21:00:32 +0000
Message-ID: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC01B344C000@marathon>
References: <CA+k3eCTWayJb2yUWJ=Z1RbzYBXvhsQGqrDWj_2mRKRXRETnFBw@mail.gmail.com> <BYAPR00MB0565EDB893FA3CA52A7D9295F5BA0@BYAPR00MB0565.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <CA+k3eCRq46A93x14yMicd9yVQSY-rcR1q-MuyD8nefjRJ+yryA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+k3eCRq46A93x14yMicd9yVQSY-rcR1q-MuyD8nefjRJ+yryA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.64.22.6]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC01B344C000marathon_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jwt-reg-review/n3FEYSQ6LztxiDrg2czOhV--MvI>
Subject: Re: [Jwt-reg-review] Seeking resolution to undetermined registration request
X-BeenThere: jwt-reg-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Expert review of proposed IANA registrations for JSON Web Token \(JWT\) claims." <jwt-reg-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jwt-reg-review>, <mailto:jwt-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jwt-reg-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:jwt-reg-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jwt-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jwt-reg-review>, <mailto:jwt-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 21:00:48 -0000

Exactly.  Technically the DEs are “John Bradley and Hannes Tschofenig”.  However, the wrinkle is that John is on this draft so it has to be Hannes.

Hannes: can you please take a look at this request.

Regards,
Roman

From: iesg [mailto:iesg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian Campbell
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2019 3:02 PM
To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org>;
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>;; jwt-reg-review@ietf.org; drafts-expert-review@iana.org
Subject: Re: [Jwt-reg-review] Seeking resolution to undetermined registration request

Thanks Mike but according to https://www.iana.org/assignments/jwt/jwt.xhtml#confirmation-methods you are not actually a DE for the registry in question.

As best I can discern, Hannes is the only eligible DE here.



On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 2:00 AM Mike Jones <Michael.Jones=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:

As a designated expert for the registry, I have approved of the registration of the "x5t#S256" JWT confirmation method.



-- Mike

________________________________
From: Jwt-reg-review <jwt-reg-review-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:jwt-reg-review-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Brian Campbell <bcampbell=40pingidentity.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:40pingidentity.com@dmarc.ietf.org>>
Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2019 1:05 PM
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org<mailto:iesg@ietf.org>>; jwt-reg-review@ietf.org<mailto:jwt-reg-review@ietf.org> <jwt-reg-review@ietf.org<mailto:jwt-reg-review@ietf.org>>; drafts-expert-review@iana.org<mailto:drafts-expert-review@iana.org> <drafts-expert-review@iana.org<mailto:drafts-expert-review@iana.org>>
Subject: [Jwt-reg-review] Seeking resolution to undetermined registration request

Per the 3rd paragraph of https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7800#section-6<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftools.ietf.org%2Fhtml%2Frfc7800%23section-6&data=02%7C01%7CMichael.Jones%40microsoft.com%7C8001c90852cb4ce6a99708d7323c871f%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637033107875826075&sdata=deixW541YIFuPqqUCzCgork5GIPjW97VlP4YRRiphxM%3D&reserved=0> I am bringing an undetermined JWT Confirmation Method registration request to the attention of the IESG in hopes of finding a resolution that will allow for draft-ietf-oauth-mtls to proceed. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-mtls-17#section-9.1<https://tools.ietf..org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-mtls-17#section-9..1> has the IANA considerations text of the request in question to register the "x5t#S256" method.

The initial review request was sent to the jwt-reg-review list on 8/13 https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jwt-reg-review/AekhdRanvPl4ej3a--5uDNB46Ps<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmailarchive.ietf.org%2Farch%2Fmsg%2Fjwt-reg-review%2FAekhdRanvPl4ej3a--5uDNB46Ps&data=02%7C01%7CMichael.Jones%40microsoft.com%7C8001c90852cb4ce6a99708d7323c871f%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637033107875826075&sdata=E3w3wUYKHR%2B3fw3H4dV7iYwrBTLKBxb9qvbQFvWAPBQ%3D&reserved=0> with a followup and clarification sent two days later https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jwt-reg-review/EShRPGAdV1BxwNo2JiHA_OOJdyk<https://nam06.safelinks..protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmailarchive.ietf.org%2Farch%2Fmsg%2Fjwt-reg-review%2FEShRPGAdV1BxwNo2JiHA_OOJdyk&data=02%7C01%7CMichael.Jones%40microsoft.com%7C8001c90852cb4ce6a99708d7323c871f%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637033107875836071&sdata=g3nzm%2BaOw0s%2FoXR3W8zRMmGIPSLrZD3KCIUnFApwyuw%3D&reserved=0>

IANA has also made a followup inquiry to the list https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jwt-reg-review/DwM94HKuuyrncRMCvN-tAtyV9CA<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmailarchive.ietf.org%2Farch%2Fmsg%2Fjwt-reg-review%2FDwM94HKuuyrncRMCvN-tAtyV9CA&data=02%7C01%7CMichael.Jones%40microsoft.com%7C8001c90852cb4ce6a99708d7323c871f%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637033107875836071&sdata=CRv%2F75blHqcCaiT%2Bo%2BNXoXpOIEeO86Q1GbAK2kcfBNk%3D&reserved=0> and there have also been some individual messages sent that don't appear in a public archive forum..

Thank you for your attention to this matter,
Brian Campbell


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited..  If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you.

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited..  If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you.