Re: [KAML] Re: Chicago bar-BOF summary

Scott Cantor <cantor.2@osu.edu> Fri, 07 September 2007 05:05 UTC

Return-path: <kaml-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ITW1w-0003Ri-L3; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 01:05:20 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ITW1v-0003Rd-Gy for kaml@ietf.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 01:05:19 -0400
Received: from pop-8.dnv.wideopenwest.com ([64.233.207.26]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ITW1u-0006Uz-Aa for kaml@ietf.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 01:05:19 -0400
Received: from [192.168.1.100] (d60-65-44-136.col.wideopenwest.com [65.60.136.44]) by pop-8.dnv.wideopenwest.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id l87559Fs020053 for <kaml@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Sep 2007 00:05:15 -0500
Message-ID: <46E0DC1B.6060405@osu.edu>
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 01:05:31 -0400
From: Scott Cantor <cantor.2@osu.edu>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: kaml@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [KAML] Re: Chicago bar-BOF summary
References: <46DE5CC1.10204@it.su.se> <8158D751-0EE0-4D58-81DB-549C4A413B68@jpl.nasa.gov> <46E05F96.1090004@anl.gov> <384D95D3-9751-44E5-ADAE-2E403803B665@jpl.nasa.gov>
In-Reply-To: <384D95D3-9751-44E5-ADAE-2E403803B665@jpl.nasa.gov>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 1.6 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: 30ac594df0e66ffa5a93eb4c48bcb014
X-BeenThere: kaml@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about SAML and Kerberos intersections <kaml.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kaml>, <mailto:kaml-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/kaml>
List-Post: <mailto:kaml@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kaml-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kaml>, <mailto:kaml-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: kaml-bounces@ietf.org

Henry B. Hotz wrote:
> Question:  Is it possible to create valid SAML tokens in XER?

Everything in SAML is expressed in XML Schema terms. Arguably any XML 
encoding/serialization that fulfills the requirements of the schema and 
prose is still SAML. Arguably.

-- Scott


_______________________________________________
KAML mailing list
KAML@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kaml