RE: [KAML] Reminder: BOF proposals to me by October 1

	Leif,

	IMO it's preferable to keep the LoA piece under the Kerberos WG
rather than under the KAML WG since - in the short-term - out-of-the-box
SAML 2.0 seems not to be able to help with LoA. Whatever we design, however,
should be extensible and eventually support/take advantage of/migrate to
SAML 2.x.

Paul Rabinovich | Software Architect | EXOSTAR LLC
13530 Dulles Technology Dr., Suite 200, Herndon, VA 20171

PH +1.703.793.7808 | FAX +1.703.793.7741

-----Original Message-----
From: Leif Johansson [mailto:leifj@it.su.se] 
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2007 1:00 PM
To: kaml@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [KAML] Reminder: BOF proposals to me by October 1

Sam Hartman wrote:
> Just a reminder that if you want a BOF at IETF 70, you need an
> internet draft (presumably a problem statement) and a BOF proposal to
> me by October 1.
>
>
> --Sam
>   
I would suggest that we continue working on the problem-statement
draft, hold another informal meeting in Vancouver and aim for a wg-
formation BOF (if that is where consensus winds up) at the IETF
after Vancouver.

How does that sound? Who would turn up for an informal meeting
in Vancouver?

    Chers Leif

_______________________________________________
KAML mailing list
KAML@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kaml

RE: [KAML] Reminder: BOF proposals to me by October 1

Attachment: smime.p7s