RE: [KAML] Reminder: BOF proposals to me by October 1

"Paul Rabinovich" <Paul.Rabinovich@exostar.com> Mon, 24 September 2007 21:13 UTC

Return-path: <kaml-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IZvFG-0006y3-U9; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:13:35 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IZvFD-0006sS-P2 for kaml@ietf.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:13:31 -0400
Received: from netmail1.exostar.com ([208.47.83.14]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IZvF2-00064Z-JD for kaml@ietf.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:13:26 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: RE: [KAML] Reminder: BOF proposals to me by October 1
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:12:56 -0400
Message-ID: <0E2D64FCAEB5C5458A494DC28270548E06E3C5F5@Netmail1.exostar.com>
In-Reply-To: <46F69BAE.9020307@it.su.se>
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [KAML] Reminder: BOF proposals to me by October 1
Thread-Index: Acf+A2l6PHwyFonYQDCzqr9aXOyfvQA66hUQ
From: "Paul Rabinovich" <Paul.Rabinovich@exostar.com>
To: "Leif Johansson" <leifj@it.su.se>, <kaml@ietf.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 995b2e24d23b953c94bac5288c432399
Cc:
X-BeenThere: kaml@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about SAML and Kerberos intersections <kaml.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kaml>, <mailto:kaml-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/kaml>
List-Post: <mailto:kaml@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kaml-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kaml>, <mailto:kaml-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0165232860=="
Errors-To: kaml-bounces@ietf.org

	Leif,

	IMO it's preferable to keep the LoA piece under the Kerberos WG
rather than under the KAML WG since - in the short-term - out-of-the-box
SAML 2.0 seems not to be able to help with LoA. Whatever we design, however,
should be extensible and eventually support/take advantage of/migrate to
SAML 2.x.

Paul Rabinovich | Software Architect | EXOSTAR LLC
13530 Dulles Technology Dr., Suite 200, Herndon, VA 20171

PH +1.703.793.7808 | FAX +1.703.793.7741


-----Original Message-----
From: Leif Johansson [mailto:leifj@it.su.se] 
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2007 1:00 PM
To: kaml@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [KAML] Reminder: BOF proposals to me by October 1

Sam Hartman wrote:
> Just a reminder that if you want a BOF at IETF 70, you need an
> internet draft (presumably a problem statement) and a BOF proposal to
> me by October 1.
>
>
> --Sam
>   
I would suggest that we continue working on the problem-statement
draft, hold another informal meeting in Vancouver and aim for a wg-
formation BOF (if that is where consensus winds up) at the IETF
after Vancouver.

How does that sound? Who would turn up for an informal meeting
in Vancouver?

    Chers Leif


_______________________________________________
KAML mailing list
KAML@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kaml
_______________________________________________
KAML mailing list
KAML@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kaml