IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [KAML] Reminder: BOF proposals to me by October 1

Leif Johansson <leifj@it.su.se> Tue, 25 September 2007 20:47 UTC

Return-path: <kaml-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IaHJz-0005Xr-8z; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:47:55 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IaHJy-0005Nj-Nr for kaml@ietf.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:47:54 -0400
Received: from smtp1.su.se ([130.237.162.112]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IaHJn-0001SA-HG for kaml@ietf.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:47:49 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.su.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 580D5741DE; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:47:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp1.su.se ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.su.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 08158-01-15; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:47:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.0.0.11] (ua-83-227-179-169.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se [83.227.179.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp1.su.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id D86C274071; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:47:30 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <46F97403.5090802@it.su.se>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:48:03 +0200
From: Leif Johansson <leifj@it.su.se>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.13 (X11/20070824)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Rabinovich <Paul.Rabinovich@exostar.com>
Subject: Re: [KAML] Reminder: BOF proposals to me by October 1
References: <0E2D64FCAEB5C5458A494DC28270548E06E3C5F5@Netmail1.exostar.com>
In-Reply-To: <0E2D64FCAEB5C5458A494DC28270548E06E3C5F5@Netmail1.exostar.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at smtp.su.se
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.222 tagged_above=-99 required=7 tests=[AWL=0.090, BAYES_00=-2.312]
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----)
X-Scan-Signature: de4f315c9369b71d7dd5909b42224370
Cc: kaml@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: kaml@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about SAML and Kerberos intersections <kaml.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kaml>, <mailto:kaml-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/kaml>
List-Post: <mailto:kaml@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kaml-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kaml>, <mailto:kaml-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: kaml-bounces@ietf.org

Paul Rabinovich wrote:
> 	Leif,
>
> 	IMO it's preferable to keep the LoA piece under the Kerberos WG
> rather than under the KAML WG since - in the short-term - out-of-the-box
> SAML 2.0 seems not to be able to help with LoA. Whatever we design, however,
>   
I think you are wrong. There are at least two ways to model LoA
using SAML - using an AC class or using an attribute.

    Cheers Leif
> should be extensible and eventually support/take advantage of/migrate to
> SAML 2.x.
>
>   



_______________________________________________
KAML mailing list
KAML@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kaml

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email