Re: [karp] draft-ietf-karp-bfd-analysis-01
Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Tue, 11 February 2014 15:43 UTC
Return-Path: <jhaas@slice.pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: karp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: karp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C731A05C8; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 07:43:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.116
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.116 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7248dvwQSELT; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 07:43:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 863841A05D5; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 07:43:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id ED563C2C7; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:43:41 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:43:41 -0500
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: "Bhatia, Manav (Manav)" <manav.bhatia@alcatel-lucent.com>
Message-ID: <20140211154341.GH21565@pfrc>
References: <20211F91F544D247976D84C5D778A4C32E587804@SG70YWXCHMBA05.zap.alcatel-lucent.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20211F91F544D247976D84C5D778A4C32E587804@SG70YWXCHMBA05.zap.alcatel-lucent.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>, "karp@ietf.org" <karp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [karp] draft-ietf-karp-bfd-analysis-01
X-BeenThere: karp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for key management for routing and transport protocols <karp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/karp>, <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/karp/>
List-Post: <mailto:karp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/karp>, <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:43:44 -0000
Manav, On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 03:29:01PM +0000, Bhatia, Manav (Manav) wrote: > Can the BFD WG members review draft-ietf-karp-bfd-analysis-01? More reviewers would be great. > We (the authors) think we're done with the gap analysis. > > Would be great to hear from the WG on whether they think we've accurately captured the gaps and if they're gaps in our understanding of the gaps. My impression on my last review (comments should be in the archive) was that the existing WG documents covering the generic crypto extensions and the SHA-2 extensions addressed the gaps. Is that correct? -- Jeff
- [karp] draft-ietf-karp-bfd-analysis-01 Bhatia, Manav (Manav)
- Re: [karp] draft-ietf-karp-bfd-analysis-01 Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [karp] draft-ietf-karp-bfd-analysis-01 Bhatia, Manav (Manav)