[karp] rt-dir review of draft-ietf-karp-crypto-table

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Tue, 21 May 2013 12:29 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans@painless-security.com>
X-Original-To: karp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: karp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71C3321F8CEC for <karp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 May 2013 05:29:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W6DtJP4GhE8M for <karp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 May 2013 05:29:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com (mail.painless-security.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6459921F85F4 for <karp@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 May 2013 05:29:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A27120608 for <karp@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 May 2013 08:26:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com ([]) by localhost (mail.suchdamage.org []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4waf7l3sIzqX for <karp@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 May 2013 08:26:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (c-98-216-0-82.hsd1.ma.comcast.net []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <karp@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 May 2013 08:26:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 09E8A440B; Tue, 21 May 2013 08:29:46 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: karp@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 08:29:45 -0400
Message-ID: <tslwqqswm6e.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-="
Subject: [karp] rt-dir review of draft-ietf-karp-crypto-table
X-BeenThere: karp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for key management for routing and transport protocols <karp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/karp>, <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/karp>
List-Post: <mailto:karp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/karp>, <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 12:29:54 -0000

I've already written back indicating that i don't think we want to
change the scope of this document or of the KARP working group.
As such, I don't think we want to address issues 1 and 6

Similar i'm sure we're correct with regard to issue 7.

I'll propose comments on some of the other issues in follow-ups to this

--- Begin Message ---

I am attaching Danny's routing directorate review of your draft. Please read his note below.

As IETF last call has completed, you do not need to heed these comments in the same way as you might for comments coming during IETF last call.

However, the ADs will be sifting through what Danny has written and potentially adding issues he raises to our Discusses/Comments. In view of that, you may feel it wise to read what he has written and see whether you are moved to answer his questions and maybe update the text.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Danny McPherson [mailto:danny@tcb.net]
> Sent: 12 May 2013 20:57
> Cc: stbryant@cisco.com; adrian@olddog.co.uk; Dan Li
> (huawei.danli@huawei.com)
> Subject: Re: Routing Area Directorate Review for draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table
> Review attached, apologies for the latency.  Also, I'm sending this
> without a full review of the review so if anything seems abrasive it
> wasn't meant to be..
> Thanks,
> -danny
--- End Message ---