Re: [karp] WG LC: draft-ietf-karp-ops-model-05 to Informational

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Wed, 10 April 2013 12:44 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: karp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: karp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 737DC21F9610 for <karp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 05:44:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tYwECNobDkCl for <karp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 05:44:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com (mail.painless-security.com [23.30.188.241]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01CDA21F9615 for <karp@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 05:44:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FCD9205CC; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 08:42:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.suchdamage.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PU8rJcDLA8C8; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 08:42:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (unknown [10.1.10.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 08:42:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 60F284499; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 08:44:17 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: Brian Weis <bew@cisco.com>
References: <FCD2CF6A-993E-49EE-8888-1A5384191462@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 08:44:17 -0400
In-Reply-To: <FCD2CF6A-993E-49EE-8888-1A5384191462@cisco.com> (Brian Weis's message of "Tue, 26 Mar 2013 17:00:19 -0700")
Message-ID: <tslsj2y7dy6.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: "karp@ietf.org" <karp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [karp] WG LC: draft-ietf-karp-ops-model-05 to Informational
X-BeenThere: karp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for key management for routing and transport protocols <karp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/karp>, <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/karp>
List-Post: <mailto:karp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/karp>, <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:44:27 -0000

Hi.  I didn't see any last call comments besides Wes's comments.  I'd
also like to get some support for Wes's comments before folding them in.
As I've said I personally support but would prefer to see if we can
shake up more than one person saying "yes" at this stage.

chairs, would it make sense for me to try and prepare a draft next week
that hopefully can be sent on?