Re: [karp] Secure Transport for PCEP - KMP Draft

"Diego R. Lopez" <diego@tid.es> Thu, 06 February 2014 21:48 UTC

Return-Path: <diego@tid.es>
X-Original-To: karp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: karp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BAC31A044C for <karp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 13:48:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.736
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.736 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1xJOPzuix0cK for <karp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 13:48:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from correo-bck.tid.es (correo-bck.tid.es [195.235.93.200]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04C771A042A for <karp@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 13:47:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sbrightmailg02.hi.inet (Sbrightmailg02.hi.inet [10.95.78.105]) by tid.hi.inet (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0N0L0058AGJWK3@tid.hi.inet> for karp@ietf.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 22:47:56 +0100 (MET)
Received: from vanvan (vanvan.hi.inet [10.95.78.49]) by sbrightmailg02.hi.inet (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id C8.13.05896.C0304F25; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 22:47:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: from correo.tid.es (mailhost.hi.inet [10.95.64.100]) by tid.hi.inet (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPS id <0N0L00586GJVK3@tid.hi.inet> for karp@ietf.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 22:47:56 +0100 (MET)
Received: from EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet ([169.254.2.159]) by EX10-HTCAS7-MAD.hi.inet ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 22:47:49 +0100
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 21:47:48 +0000
From: "Diego R. Lopez" <diego@tid.es>
In-reply-to: <1B502206DFA0C544B7A60469152008633F1AB200@eusaamb105.ericsson.se>
X-Originating-IP: [10.95.64.115]
To: Uma Chunduri <uma.chunduri@ericsson.com>
Message-id: <47B0D59B-E691-4B34-8F23-AD24394D1070@tid.es>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_AMMTlYOWEBNx4IXORr7mtA)"
Content-language: en-US
Accept-Language: en-US, es-ES
Thread-topic: Secure Transport for PCEP - KMP Draft
Thread-index: Ac8iA3fhMXlX8jTUSJWuLzZgbDgpnQBV/c6A
X-AuditID: 0a5f4e69-b7f778e000001708-13-52f4030cd001
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprEIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsXCFe9nqMvD/CXI4MhEXou939YwOjB6LFny kymAMYrLJiU1J7MstUjfLoEro7XvP3vBU8uKnb+mMDUwNhl1MXJySAiYSOzvO8YGYYtJXLi3 Hsjm4hAS2MYo8e3RRmYI5zujxI09a6CcmYwSp8/NAmthEVCVuDB3BTuIzQZkP2r+DWYLCxhJ LNr7ghnE5hTwk1g/7xMjxAoFiT/nHrOA2CICOhKNb2cC1XNwMAuoSTy8rgcS5hWwlPjw6CIr hC0o8WPyPbByZoFoiYu7fzFC2OISza03weKMArIS7+bPZ4UYaSyxbuUEqPFGEoeO7WCGWCsg sWTPeShbVOLl439g9UICvhLfFm1jn8AoNgvJullI1s1Csg7CNpB4f24+M4StLbFs4WsoW19i 45ezUPVmEs1/DzMiq1nAyLGKUaw4qSgzPaMkNzEzJ93ASC8jUy8zL7VkEyMkHjN3MC7fqXKI UYCDUYmHV2HF5yAh1sSy4srcQ4wSHMxKIry2d4BCvCmJlVWpRfnxRaU5qcWHGJk4OKUaGBsd Xtiblt6+opowec6hNRWey1/uOXCNSTvdWOKjWcv6Q/s1HgvE3JPvOZ7mcTV756Frid+qMu6f W/cm4H9iYMOiD9+OLeNlVFg/d8u/rXmHnjXqFsbuPjLDbNELZnkJn++5D1af6/wmU9R4p7/z ydNHaldCC9/afnKvvSGVv2OzFuPKneFtk22UWIozEg21mIuKEwGeDeb9pQIAAA==
References: <1B502206DFA0C544B7A60469152008633F1AB200@eusaamb105.ericsson.se>
Cc: KARP Working Group <karp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [karp] Secure Transport for PCEP - KMP Draft
X-BeenThere: karp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for key management for routing and transport protocols <karp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/karp>, <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/karp/>
List-Post: <mailto:karp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/karp>, <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 21:48:03 -0000

Hi,

Uma probably was not aware that the first place in which we discussed the PCEPS draft was precisely KARP (remember Berlin...)

I must say that I support his view of a clear need for KMPs for supporting secure transport for routing. Apart from the PCEPS draft, I agree with Uma in that SDN (and NFV as well) will bring an additional need for secured connections in routing protocols in the wider sense.

Be goode,

On 5 Feb 2014, at 00:59 , Uma Chunduri <uma.chunduri@ericsson.com<mailto:uma.chunduri@ericsson.com>> wrote:


Last IETF I come across this draft in PCE WG and had a brief chat with one of the authors Diego L. (CC’ed)  –
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lopez-pce-pceps/?include_text=1

While this document is yet to be enhanced further per authors; it may  show operators are indeed seeking to use KMPs for secure transport for routing.
This becomes bit more relevant in the age of SDN and a secure transport between the controller (open-flow, I2RS etc..) and routers talking various routing protocols  is important.

Thought to share with KAPR WG  in light of the last IETF discussions on this topic.

--
Uma C.


--
"Esta vez no fallaremos, Doctor Infierno"

Dr Diego R. Lopez
Telefonica I+D
http://people.tid.es/diego.lopez/

e-mail: diego@tid.es
Tel:    +34 913 129 041
Mobile: +34 682 051 091
-----------------------------------------


________________________________

Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx