IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [karp] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-07

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Mon, 29 April 2013 14:37 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: karp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: karp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 742D221F9E4C; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:37:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nH7-+zp8Gqi1; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og105.obsmtp.com (exprod7og105.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.163]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C6521F9E4B; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob105.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUX6FuHVrwVi3MoijUi9NKPyAb/1Bzlfv@postini.com; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:37:44 PDT
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DE851B813F; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 017B2190061; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:37:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.133]) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.132]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:37:44 -0700
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: "Black, David" <david.black@emc.com>
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-07
Thread-Index: Ac5ByJPFxMQV0ntvRsGIbN7yaluElADGrB/i//p5/YCABgMJAA==
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:37:43 +0000
Message-ID: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307751666F9@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
References: <8D3D17ACE214DC429325B2B98F3AE71293F3BD27@MX15A.corp.emc.com> <tsla9omh811.fsf@mit.edu> <8D3D17ACE214DC429325B2B98F3AE71293F3BDB0@MX15A.corp.emc.com>
In-Reply-To: <8D3D17ACE214DC429325B2B98F3AE71293F3BDB0@MX15A.corp.emc.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.1.10]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <EA362B2EEBE8244F8BD734E09226EE7D@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>, "karp@ietf.org" <karp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [karp] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-07
X-BeenThere: karp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for key management for routing and transport protocols <karp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/karp>, <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/karp>
List-Post: <mailto:karp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/karp>, <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:37:45 -0000

On Apr 25, 2013, at 2:49 PM, "Black, David" <david.black@emc.com> wrote:
> I have no problem with the field being a binary identifier, but I think
> implementers should be put on notice that binary comparison of human input
> Unicode strings doesn't work as expected unless some things are done to
> make it work (this used to be known as string preparation).

+1.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email