Re: [karp] WG LC: draft-ietf-karp-ops-model-05 to Informational

Brian Weis <bew@cisco.com> Wed, 10 April 2013 17:10 UTC

Return-Path: <bew@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: karp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: karp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3727A21F8E7B for <karp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:10:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i-RCebiYlVUd for <karp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:10:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-2.cisco.com (mtv-iport-2.cisco.com [173.36.130.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64A6C21F8ECC for <karp@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:10:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1177; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1365613843; x=1366823443; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=GdrJxoWHbifsWFjm3NlEVUXncb4GctoNSzAgprKx2gU=; b=PF2zcUuAA7ehpl4bxvTO7ZD/9SQVqCZTp83Hn/I2MqhkuLyrqohFMAPK zBCZsEg1NI8oObfKR2/WxIYdoVnOZ2KEljvVqo6D9J4sm7iP5Yj5ZRgXh MCNPxPLMsXUEJtZcwCLgz/ctl5eYo5RbavSZMNv7H5hP42q+rdaHIVMJB A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgkFANmbZVGrRDoI/2dsb2JhbABQDoJ4wW6BDxZ0gh8BAQEDATo6BQULC0ZXBhOIDgW/PI5jMweCYGEDiQKKM4NLkQ6CTF8c
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,449,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="78296092"
Received: from mtv-core-3.cisco.com ([171.68.58.8]) by mtv-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Apr 2013 17:10:43 +0000
Received: from stealth-10-32-244-210.cisco.com (stealth-10-32-244-210.cisco.com [10.32.244.210]) by mtv-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r3AHAY4N016189; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 17:10:42 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: Brian Weis <bew@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <tslsj2y7dy6.fsf@mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:08:15 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <064CEDAF-F56A-44FD-9D1D-D7D47FCCC6A3@cisco.com>
References: <FCD2CF6A-993E-49EE-8888-1A5384191462@cisco.com> <tslsj2y7dy6.fsf@mit.edu>
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
Cc: "karp@ietf.org" <karp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [karp] WG LC: draft-ietf-karp-ops-model-05 to Informational
X-BeenThere: karp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for key management for routing and transport protocols <karp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/karp>, <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/karp>
List-Post: <mailto:karp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/karp>, <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 17:10:44 -0000

As chair, I'd like to see more declarations of support before progressing the document. I'll extend the end of last call until 4/16 in order to give others the chance to comment. Sam, why don't you hold off with a new draft until then.

Folks, the KARP work will be of little value if the operators can't deploy it. This document provides needed advice to operators on best practices for handling credentials and keys. Advice on use of the KARP key table specification is a significant part of the document. We do need to show consensus that it is the right advice. Please read and comment, or at least provide an indication of approval or disapproval.

Thanks,
Brian

On Apr 10, 2013, at 5:44 AM, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> wrote:

> Hi.  I didn't see any last call comments besides Wes's comments.  I'd
> also like to get some support for Wes's comments before folding them in.
> As I've said I personally support but would prefer to see if we can
> shake up more than one person saying "yes" at this stage.
> 
> chairs, would it make sense for me to try and prepare a draft next week
> that hopefully can be sent on?