Re: [karp] Question: splitting RAPD discussion from policy framework discussion in draft-atwood-karp-aapm-rp

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 01 August 2013 12:55 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: karp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: karp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22B4421E80F8 for <karp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 05:55:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.702
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.702 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.103, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GauVlXbKhwL3 for <karp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 05:55:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (mail.smetech.net [208.254.26.82]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 632CF21F9E22 for <karp@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 05:53:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [208.254.26.81]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AD36F24038; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 08:54:12 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([208.254.26.82]) by localhost (ronin.smetech.net [208.254.26.81]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BZEXX7uQ2GTN; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 08:53:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from dhcp-540a.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-540a.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.84.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD989F2401B; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 08:54:10 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <tsltxj97ewa.fsf@mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 08:53:38 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <523BEE6E-0C37-498C-8C42-6F5D3E26092F@vigilsec.com>
References: <tslzjt2exde.fsf@mit.edu> <7F6E286F-A089-4AB3-9490-5DFDF2A69278@vigilsec.com> <tsltxj97ewa.fsf@mit.edu>
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Cc: karp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [karp] Question: splitting RAPD discussion from policy framework discussion in draft-atwood-karp-aapm-rp
X-BeenThere: karp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for key management for routing and transport protocols <karp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/karp>, <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/karp>
List-Post: <mailto:karp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/karp>, <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 12:55:21 -0000

Sam:

>    Russ> I agree that it would be valuable to tackle the "broader
>    Russ> policy framework."  Russ
> 
> Do you think it would be helpful to split them into a separate document?

Yes please.

Russ