IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [karp] rt-dir review of draft-ietf-karp-crypto-table

Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> Tue, 21 May 2013 15:59 UTC

Return-Path: <kent@bbn.com>
X-Original-To: karp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: karp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B149621F97CD for <karp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 May 2013 08:59:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3qXoaDrOw-ON for <karp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 May 2013 08:59:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.bbn.com (smtp.bbn.com [128.33.0.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47B4C21F97ED for <karp@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 May 2013 08:59:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dommiel.bbn.com ([192.1.122.15]:52957 helo=COMSEC.local) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <kent@bbn.com>) id 1Ueoxv-000HQg-8b for karp@ietf.org; Tue, 21 May 2013 11:59:07 -0400
Message-ID: <519B99CA.9080307@bbn.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 11:59:06 -0400
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: karp@ietf.org
References: <tslwqqswm6e.fsf@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <tslwqqswm6e.fsf@mit.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060003050209040906050106"
Subject: Re: [karp] rt-dir review of draft-ietf-karp-crypto-table
X-BeenThere: karp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for key management for routing and transport protocols <karp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/karp>, <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/karp>
List-Post: <mailto:karp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/karp>, <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 15:59:13 -0000

I agree with Sam that the scope for this doc makes the first comment out 
of scope.

More importantly, the RPKI and BGPSEC are not relevant to the key table 
design. The former requires
no crypto operations on a router. The latter deals with keys for 
routers, but management of these keys
is very different, precisely because they are public keys.

Steve
-------
On 5/21/13 8:29 AM, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I've already written back indicating that i don't think we want to
> change the scope of this document or of the KARP working group.
> As such, I don't think we want to address issues 1 and 6
>
> Similar i'm sure we're correct with regard to issue 7.
>
> I'll propose comments on some of the other issues in follow-ups to this
> message.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> karp mailing list
> karp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/karp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email