Re: [karp] Question: splitting RAPD discussion from policy framework discussion in draft-atwood-karp-aapm-rp

I asked that we consider this split because I support adoption of the
discussion of the SPD/PAD-like mechanisms, but do not support the broader,
rather high level policy framework text.

So, count me as one vote for the split.

Steve

> Hi.  During the presentation of our draft, I asked Steve Kent whether he
> thought it would be valuable to split the discussion of the conseptual
> database similar to aspects of the IPsec PAD and SPD from the broader
> policy framework.  He said yes.  I said it would be valuable to get
> feedback from others about whether this split is useful.  The chairs
> asked me to ask on the list.
> 7
> _______________________________________________
> karp mailing list
> karp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/karp
>