Re: [karp] Question: splitting RAPD discussion from policy framework discussion in draft-atwood-karp-aapm-rp

Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> Thu, 01 August 2013 11:51 UTC

Return-Path: <kent@bbn.com>
X-Original-To: karp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: karp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE84921E80C0 for <karp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:51:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.377
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.377 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.222, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JPbjtGYFONni for <karp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:51:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.bbn.com (smtp.bbn.com [128.33.1.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A118921E80B5 for <karp@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:51:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dommiel.bbn.com ([192.1.122.15]:47516 helo=dhcp-13ac.meeting.ietf.org) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <kent@bbn.com>) id 1V4rPG-0009nI-CG for karp@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 07:50:58 -0400
Message-ID: <51FA4BA1.7020508@bbn.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 07:50:57 -0400
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: karp@ietf.org
References: <tslzjt2exde.fsf@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <tslzjt2exde.fsf@mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [karp] Question: splitting RAPD discussion from policy framework discussion in draft-atwood-karp-aapm-rp
X-BeenThere: karp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for key management for routing and transport protocols <karp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/karp>, <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/karp>
List-Post: <mailto:karp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/karp>, <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 11:51:10 -0000

I asked that we consider this split because I support adoption of the
discussion of the SPD/PAD-like mechanisms, but do not support the broader,
rather high level policy framework text.

So, count me as one vote for the split.

Steve

> Hi.  During the presentation of our draft, I asked Steve Kent whether he
> thought it would be valuable to split the discussion of the conseptual
> database similar to aspects of the IPsec PAD and SPD from the broader
> policy framework.  He said yes.  I said it would be valuable to get
> feedback from others about whether this split is useful.  The chairs
> asked me to ask on the list.
> 7
> _______________________________________________
> karp mailing list
> karp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/karp
>