Re: [karp] Call for WG adoption: draft-mahesh-karp-rkmp-04

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 29 July 2013 07:47 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: karp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: karp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A2E221F99A9 for <karp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 00:47:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.586
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.586 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.013, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pGv1gA3QzHLD for <karp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 00:47:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (mail.smetech.net [208.254.26.82]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26BAE21F9C41 for <karp@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 00:47:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [208.254.26.81]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C39B9A40A6; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 03:47:44 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([208.254.26.82]) by localhost (ronin.smetech.net [208.254.26.81]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jOhO3OMm3jUK; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 03:47:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from v150.vpn.iad.rg.net (v150.vpn.iad.rg.net [198.180.150.150]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDE239A40A3; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 03:47:41 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <51F6173E.70007@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 03:47:25 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <19780515-2383-452C-B1E8-33CB033AA2D6@vigilsec.com>
References: <51F6173E.70007@joelhalpern.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Cc: "karp@ietf.org" <karp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [karp] Call for WG adoption: draft-mahesh-karp-rkmp-04
X-BeenThere: karp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for key management for routing and transport protocols <karp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/karp>, <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/karp>
List-Post: <mailto:karp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/karp>, <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 07:47:35 -0000

I am confused by the approach taken in this draft.  I only skimmed it.  We defined a crypto key table, and that document is close to IESG approval.  I think that IKEv2 should be used to populate the key table, and then TCP-AO can pull keying material from the table, as is already described, at least partially, in the key table document.

Russ


On Jul 29, 2013, at 3:18 AM, Joel M. Halpern wrote:

> This draft has been discussed in the WG, and revised based on WG feedback and discussions among the authors.
> At this point, the question is whether it is ready for the WG to formally take the draft on and take it forward.
> 
> So this is a call for adoption of
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mahesh-karp-rkmp/
> by the KARP WG.
> Please respond to the list with support or substantive objections within 3 weeks (adding a week since we are in the IETF meeting.
> 
> Yours,
> Joel M. Halpern