Re: [karp] WG LC: draft-ietf-karp-ops-model-05 to Informational

I support draft-ietf-karp-ops-model-05 as Informational.

I assume that the corrections that I suggested (off-line) to Sam and
Dacheng will be incorporated into a final version.

Wes's issue of key expiration makes sense to me, so I support it.

Wes' issue of grouping/ungrouping peers makes sense to me, so I support
it.  We have touched on one aspect of this issue (the scope of keys) in
draft-atwood-karp-akam-rp.

I have read the comment on Section 6.1 and the email that is cited.  I
agree that, for the kind of document that ops-model is intended to be
(i.e., targeted at a member of a routing working group who knows little
about security), no assumption should be made about "proper security
procedures being in place".  It is the fact that we know that they are
_not_ in place that is driving the entire KARP effort, after all.  I
therefore support inclusion of more text here.

  Bill

On 10/04/2013 8:44 AM, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Hi.  I didn't see any last call comments besides Wes's comments.  I'd
> also like to get some support for Wes's comments before folding them in.
> As I've said I personally support but would prefer to see if we can
> shake up more than one person saying "yes" at this stage.
> 
> chairs, would it make sense for me to try and prepare a draft next week
> that hopefully can be sent on?
> _______________________________________________
> karp mailing list
> karp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/karp
> 

-- 
Dr. J.W. Atwood, Eng.             tel:   +1 (514) 848-2424 x3046
Distinguished Professor Emeritus  fax:   +1 (514) 848-2830
Department of Computer Science
   and Software Engineering
Concordia University EV 3.185     email:william.atwood@concordia.ca
1455 de Maisonneuve Blvd. West    http://users.encs.concordia.ca/~bill
Montreal, Quebec Canada H3G 1M8