Re: [keyassure] [dane] #23: Asserting DANE exclusivity for an entire domain
Paul Wouters <paul@xelerance.com> Mon, 21 March 2011 19:49 UTC
Return-Path: <paul@xelerance.com>
X-Original-To: keyassure@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: keyassure@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 642FD3A6856 for <keyassure@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:49:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.59
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.59 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.009, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d35ifBmCDVvT for <keyassure@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:49:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from newtla.xelerance.com (newtla.xelerance.com [193.110.157.143]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 608853A684D for <keyassure@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:49:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tla.xelerance.com (tla.xelerance.com [193.110.157.130]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by newtla.xelerance.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5893CC585; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 15:50:34 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 15:50:33 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@xelerance.com>
To: dane issue tracker <trac+dane@trac.tools.ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <061.05db8c262c83655cb47a8699cab6c2ac@trac.tools.ietf.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.1103211549340.20162@newtla.xelerance.com>
References: <061.05db8c262c83655cb47a8699cab6c2ac@trac.tools.ietf.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (LFD 962 2008-03-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Cc: keyassure@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [keyassure] [dane] #23: Asserting DANE exclusivity for an entire domain
X-BeenThere: keyassure@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Key Assurance With DNSSEC <keyassure.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/keyassure>, <mailto:keyassure-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/keyassure>
List-Post: <mailto:keyassure@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:keyassure-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/keyassure>, <mailto:keyassure-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:49:03 -0000
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, dane issue tracker wrote: > #23: Asserting DANE exclusivity for an entire domain > > I would like to be able to assert DANE exclusivity for an entire domain so > that, with respect to clients that check DANE first and fall back to a > mainstream public CA list, a public CA cannot fabricate a TLS service I do > not offer. Could this not be done by adding an "empty" CAA record? Also, is this not what people here call "dictating policy to the client" ? Paul
- [keyassure] [dane] #23: Asserting DANE exclusivit… dane issue tracker
- Re: [keyassure] [dane] #23: Asserting DANE exclus… Paul Wouters
- Re: [keyassure] [dane] #23: Asserting DANE exclus… Matt McCutchen