Re: [keyassure] WebID at W3C and keyassure

Jakob Schlyter <jakob@kirei.se> Fri, 11 February 2011 23:10 UTC

Return-Path: <jakob@kirei.se>
X-Original-To: keyassure@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: keyassure@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09CF83A69F0 for <keyassure@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 15:10:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wd+Uzn5ZIh4I for <keyassure@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 15:10:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from spg.kirei.se (gomi.kirei.se [91.206.174.9]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BFC23A69EA for <keyassure@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 15:10:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kirei.se; s=spg20100524; h=received:subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=UdX25ZDEYLqQPIXxaP8X8NGNn304Ronm2vzEK8PRIq0=; b=oTUasZBysWq9Lk3+/EFMbesEiYeJdZbMiKaxEAYlIrAO5RYg5vNnQlmORl4KHKL7gYt7feiZ0EDkU cqvE11ySvaGJZSXw6TOu0Qjpd9948Zi/QjterthsiU4q2T/cy7BrtC57xUvgZoPuPXYPH5r4T2pMpl QYOJ8rLqDfLFHpPE=
Received: from mail.kirei.se (unknown [91.206.174.10]) by spg.kirei.se (Halon Mail Gateway) with ESMTPS; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 00:10:32 +0100 (CET)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Jakob Schlyter <jakob@kirei.se>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimz=e_E3GOcSCgkSW_2tWtD74QXaWN+_9=fA6bL@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 00:10:27 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D5CC602E-DFEE-47C3-8678-D5D594503C26@kirei.se>
References: <57722B1C-F0AE-42D9-8ABE-30223D4F0D51@bblfish.net> <201102102017.p1AKH7iR028493@new.toad.com> <19409B47-4FB1-4705-B670-5D2570EBE76B@bblfish.net> <4D54876A.4090302@vpnc.org> <7E533869-1CCF-4256-84D4-E15578BAE4E1@bblfish.net> <AANLkTimz=e_E3GOcSCgkSW_2tWtD74QXaWN+_9=fA6bL@mail.gmail.com>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Cc: keyassure@ietf.org, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Subject: Re: [keyassure] WebID at W3C and keyassure
X-BeenThere: keyassure@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Key Assurance With DNSSEC <keyassure.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/keyassure>, <mailto:keyassure-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/keyassure>
List-Post: <mailto:keyassure@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:keyassure-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/keyassure>, <mailto:keyassure-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 23:10:29 -0000

On 11 feb 2011, at 15.14, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:

> DNS is not an appropriate place to store attributes specific to 'user@example.com'.

IMHO, that's a pretty strong statement - RFC 4398 (section 3.2) does not agree with you at all.

	jakob