Re: [keyassure] Objective: Restrictive versus Supplementary Models

Paul Wouters <paul@xelerance.com> Fri, 01 April 2011 07:16 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@xelerance.com>
X-Original-To: keyassure@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: keyassure@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F5263A6BD7 for <keyassure@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 00:16:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.593
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.593 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.006, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b50y8bvmU2LP for <keyassure@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 00:16:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from newtla.xelerance.com (newtla.xelerance.com [193.110.157.143]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C5A63A6849 for <keyassure@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 00:16:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tla.xelerance.com (tla.xelerance.com [193.110.157.130]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by newtla.xelerance.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42A90C5A0; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 03:18:08 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 03:18:07 -0400 (EDT)
From: Paul Wouters <paul@xelerance.com>
To: Martin Rex <mrex@sap.com>
In-Reply-To: <201103311336.p2VDafum022751@fs4113.wdf.sap.corp>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.1104010316100.18318@newtla.xelerance.com>
References: <201103311336.p2VDafum022751@fs4113.wdf.sap.corp>
User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (LFD 962 2008-03-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: keyassure@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [keyassure] Objective: Restrictive versus Supplementary Models
X-BeenThere: keyassure@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Key Assurance With DNSSEC <keyassure.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/keyassure>, <mailto:keyassure-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/keyassure>
List-Post: <mailto:keyassure@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:keyassure-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/keyassure>, <mailto:keyassure-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 07:16:34 -0000

On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Martin Rex wrote:

> To me, processing unsigned TLSA records is similar to
> processing unsigned OCSP responses or unsigned CRLs.
> I would not do the latter, and I'm in doubt that the former
> is a good idea.

Agreed.

Paul