Re: [keyassure] publishing the public key

Paul Wouters <paul@xelerance.com> Tue, 15 February 2011 16:19 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@xelerance.com>
X-Original-To: keyassure@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: keyassure@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 367033A6C38 for <keyassure@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 08:19:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h8uY5dfzu-OS for <keyassure@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 08:18:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from newtla.xelerance.com (newtla.xelerance.com [193.110.157.143]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C1163A6C30 for <keyassure@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 08:18:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tla.xelerance.com (tla.xelerance.com [193.110.157.130]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by newtla.xelerance.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01759C57C; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:19:23 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:19:22 -0500
From: Paul Wouters <paul@xelerance.com>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <4D5A9C2F.6050205@vpnc.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.1102151117150.3131@newtla.xelerance.com>
References: <928BE494-C59D-4FFF-9390-C459A4BC2107@bblfish.net> <20110214124617.GA31136@LK-Perkele-VI.localdomain> <20110215022103.GA2874@odin.mars.sol> <alpine.LFD.1.10.1102142139560.3131@newtla.xelerance.com> <4D59F233.7080708@vpnc.org> <alpine.LFD.1.10.1102150009450.3131@newtla.xelerance.com> <4D5A9C2F.6050205@vpnc.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (LFD 962 2008-03-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Cc: keyassure@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [keyassure] publishing the public key
X-BeenThere: keyassure@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Key Assurance With DNSSEC <keyassure.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/keyassure>, <mailto:keyassure-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/keyassure>
List-Post: <mailto:keyassure@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:keyassure-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/keyassure>, <mailto:keyassure-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:19:00 -0000

On Tue, 15 Feb 2011, Paul Hoffman wrote:

>> So please don't call bare public key out of scope yet.
>
> Paul, saying that is ridiculous. In the message that preceded the one you 
> replied to, I actually supported bare keys as long as proponents can propose 
> wording that the WG would support on how they should be included.

Sorry, I should have been more clear. I did not mean you personally with
that statement.  I meant in general for the keyassure list to keep bare
keys under consideration when continuing to work out the DANE protocol.

Paul