Re: [kitten] draft-ietf-kitten-rfc5653bis-02 review

Wang Weijun <weijun.wang@oracle.com> Tue, 10 February 2015 10:41 UTC

Return-Path: <weijun.wang@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FF901A012D for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 02:41:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aQ2p_VY59Wyz for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 02:41:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from userp1040.oracle.com (userp1040.oracle.com [156.151.31.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DC361A00FE for <kitten@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 02:41:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from acsinet21.oracle.com (acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id t1AAf3pI018998 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:41:04 GMT
Received: from aserv0122.oracle.com (aserv0122.oracle.com [141.146.126.236]) by acsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t1AAf2XK020819 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:41:03 GMT
Received: from abhmp0019.oracle.com (abhmp0019.oracle.com [141.146.116.25]) by aserv0122.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t1AAf2gP008987; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:41:02 GMT
Received: from [192.168.10.106] (/114.250.155.87) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 02:40:57 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Wang Weijun <weijun.wang@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1502061704130.3953@multics.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:40:25 +0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <85E13C1B-F11F-4D61-96D3-A7ECFF5A1BFC@oracle.com>
References: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1501201753140.23489@multics.mit.edu> <54CE9F5B.9070808@mit.edu> <54CEE8E5.5080701@oracle.com> <54D2FCD5.6060404@oracle.com> <54D3190D.8080003@mit.edu> <54D31FD0.9030508@oracle.com> <54D39523.5070700@mit.edu> <54D404FE.8010009@oracle.com> <54D40D6A.7010704@mit.edu> <54D4100E.7070200@oracle.com> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1502061704130.3953@multics.mit.edu>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
X-Source-IP: acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/1EwRdxqECk6l4xZsoLsOnQ3FGpM>
Cc: kitten@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [kitten] draft-ietf-kitten-rfc5653bis-02 review
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:41:07 -0000

Hi Ben

> On Feb 7, 2015, at 07:13, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>; wrote:
> 
> The unchanged text from RFC 5653 could also benefit from a general
> copyediting pass, but I do not think I am prepared to perform one during
> the WGLC period.

I will spend some time talking with my colleagues on your opinions on stream-based methods. If we want to make any change on them, that will be much bigger than the current new GSSException method. I don't want to waste an RFC number if we have to modify the document again soon.

Thanks
Weijun