Re: [kitten] sasl-saml-ec-18: bookkeeping changes requested

Robbie Harwood <rharwood@redhat.com> Fri, 23 August 2019 15:13 UTC

Return-Path: <rharwood@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1712E120073 for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 08:13:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BKt_8m3V6R4t for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 08:13:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B9C4120047 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 08:13:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC321106E281; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 15:13:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (dhcp-10-20-1-130.bss.redhat.com [10.20.1.130]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADF111001944; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 15:13:50 +0000 (UTC)
From: Robbie Harwood <rharwood@redhat.com>
To: "Cantor, Scott" <cantor.2@osu.edu>
Cc: "kitten@ietf.org" <kitten@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <A3B5AFBE-2F57-4A9A-8106-7F64A03CBE55@osu.edu>
References: <jlg1rxcsy0u.fsf@redhat.com> <A3B5AFBE-2F57-4A9A-8106-7F64A03CBE55@osu.edu>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 11:13:59 -0400
Message-ID: <jlgh86752yw.fsf@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.64]); Fri, 23 Aug 2019 15:13:51 +0000 (UTC)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/86fex7vRber_pONNdtlbFIkh89c>
Subject: Re: [kitten] sasl-saml-ec-18: bookkeeping changes requested
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 15:13:55 -0000

"Cantor, Scott" <cantor.2@osu.edu> writes:

> On 8/22/19, 5:14 PM, "Robbie Harwood" <rharwood@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Additionally, it doesn't like having a separate "Normative
>> References" and "Normative References for GSS-API Implementers"
>> section.  While I don't know that it's technically required to name
>> the sections a certain way, I think it would be easiest to make a
>> single "Normative References" section.
>
> That was taken verbatim from the earlier GS2 mechanims, I believe, but
> it doesn't matter to me.

Ah, okay.  Either way should be fine then; I'll just note it in the
review.

Thanks,
--Robbie