IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [kitten] New Version Notification for draft-kaduk-kitten-gss-loop-01.txt (fwd)

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Thu, 21 November 2013 19:59 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59B161AE17E for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 11:59:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F-ipGZ0yeCqX for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 11:59:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a97.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcaid.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.83]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90C641AE14B for <kitten@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 11:59:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a97.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a97.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBB22286059 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 11:59:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com (mail-wi0-f169.google.com [209.85.212.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a97.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8073C286058 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 11:59:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id hm6so631063wib.4 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 11:59:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=PMUocsgDCK1jUz8SX1PcQ2Fl6lvuLuxKoL9S+zhKLw8=; b=IKuS659fxU+bliPEmKssiOISGgCQU6R9+sFMOowmTfMLOXJOcDqZiR30otaW9UF+DS gOT7sKtf/Je7wYUVI0GlBPUqly7Z7ppLLSBk57VRIGhwL9L6KixxV+wwxPOcYUyBS/nS Jypjghc4EssolAtI/Bc3SIwFBOOmWjgEkuw6Yy2+VNZL9DMSJBQ2hv8AE7s1lCOicbmb bC3oobfKPYqFcuJ3GQXC8eybI6pOel6nZNELaZqRaJ7Fq7eTzvTPTlAsMwoAiRxEwBED CF8dIOCmnspEIr6WEhziXaY66Q9F8MShHgrqwNKvbaB19UxSzvBrckNtWaapa4H3QLez qfDg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.123.8 with SMTP id lw8mr7118965wjb.40.1385063985543; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 11:59:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.216.151.136 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 11:59:45 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1311211333130.23560@multics.mit.edu>
References: <20131120235129.7E4E71AACA@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1311201921370.23560@multics.mit.edu> <7346_1385010106_rAL51j7j007404_20131121050138.GB3655@localhost> <1385050186.6315.15.camel@destiny.pc.cs.cmu.edu> <CAK3OfOgPxFzMRAKC48Bz3svPRp85h+mMUNppVTQOSYZ9EEvj1w@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1311211333130.23560@multics.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 13:59:45 -0600
Message-ID: <CAK3OfOi9TLFrCiBEoJq3bEj3g=-f6jGF+rSRqWgFV-sue_W+Nw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: "kitten@ietf.org" <kitten@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [kitten] New Version Notification for draft-kaduk-kitten-gss-loop-01.txt (fwd)
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 19:59:55 -0000

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Nov 2013, Nico Williams wrote:
>> Also, src_name can be left NULL -- the application can use
>> gss_inquire_context() instead.  So the only real problem here is
>> deleg_cred_handle.
>
>
> That's a good point.  My sample code doesn't even use the returned value,
> just requested it on the grounds that it is a common thing to want.
>
> I'm somewhat inclined to modify the sample code to not request src_name.

That's fine.  But we want devs who look at this code to know that they
must provide an authorization function, so a bit of code inquiring the
src name and a comment about the required authz check would be nice.

Nico
--

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status