IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [kitten] Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-kitten-tls-channel-bindings-for-tls13-14: (with DISCUSS)

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Wed, 23 February 2022 19:43 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B85C03A0938; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 11:43:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SaelMa98OUeq; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 11:43:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50A5A3A091F; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 11:43:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 21NJhH4M002189 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 23 Feb 2022 14:43:23 -0500
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 11:43:17 -0800
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, kitten@ietf.org, draft-ietf-kitten-tls-channel-bindings-for-tls13@ietf.org, kitten-chairs@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20220223194317.GI12881@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <164564529663.28442.4015005677356062750@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <164564529663.28442.4015005677356062750@ietfa.amsl.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/AiCGtsxEL6TKpRTbo7yXUdiudGo>
Subject: Re: [kitten] Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-kitten-tls-channel-bindings-for-tls13-14: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 19:43:46 -0000

On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 11:41:36AM -0800, Martin Duke via Datatracker wrote:
> Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-kitten-tls-channel-bindings-for-tls13-14: Discuss
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-kitten-tls-channel-bindings-for-tls13/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> A simple thing: the document header should state that it updates RFC 8446.

No, it should not.

This topic was discussed with the TLS WG and there was strong feedback that
the use of the "Updates:" header was inappropriate.

See the thread at
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/vH74JoSGYpJv7Tcem60L3RtNa9U/

-Ben

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email