IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [kitten] [nfsv4] draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcsec-gssv3: request for review

"Adamson, Andy" <William.Adamson@netapp.com> Mon, 04 August 2014 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <William.Adamson@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6312B1B2BAD; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 09:38:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZrbXsA9RWJSO; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 09:38:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx12.netapp.com (mx12.netapp.com [216.240.18.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DE8D1A0451; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 09:38:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,799,1400050800"; d="scan'208";a="179931786"
Received: from vmwexceht02-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.76.240]) by mx12-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 04 Aug 2014 09:38:21 -0700
Received: from HIOEXCMBX03-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.36) by vmwexceht02-prd.hq.netapp.com (10.106.76.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 09:38:18 -0700
Received: from HIOEXCMBX03-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.36) by hioexcmbx03-prd.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.913.22; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 09:38:17 -0700
Received: from HIOEXCMBX03-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([::1]) by hioexcmbx03-prd.hq.netapp.com ([fe80::6112:44a3:1946:292f%21]) with mapi id 15.00.0913.011; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 09:38:17 -0700
From: "Adamson, Andy" <William.Adamson@netapp.com>
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Thread-Topic: [nfsv4] draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcsec-gssv3: request for review
Thread-Index: AQHPrAU48wbIQBIMg0W+Un2kpIHDeZu7PYKAgAGURgCABFCEgA==
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 16:38:16 +0000
Message-ID: <DB49D4A2-0EFF-4338-8F15-8459EEEBD5E8@netapp.com>
References: <DC941FEB-725A-49E1-8C38-FF765454827C@netapp.com> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1407301239260.21571@multics.mit.edu> <20140801224505.GB3579@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20140801224505.GB3579@localhost>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
x-originating-ip: [10.122.56.79]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <4B4AC2733C182648BE32E257CE8FD7CF@hq.netapp.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/CApsiCxTmxCHhNnqJ4aTNpJoT28
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 09:39:49 -0700
Cc: "kitten@ietf.org" <kitten@ietf.org>, "Adamson, Andy" <William.Adamson@netapp.com>, NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [kitten] [nfsv4] draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcsec-gssv3: request for review
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 16:38:23 -0000

On Aug 1, 2014, at 6:45 PM, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote:

>> 
>> ---
>> Why is RPCSEC_GSS_BIND_CHANNEL marked as "not used" in the sample
>> code on page 7?  It is not otherwise mentioned in the draft, and the
> 
> Dunno.  It was never marked so in my draft.  Andy?

It is marked as “not used” in GSSv3 because GSSv3 provides it’s own channel binding method.

—>Andy

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status