Re: [kitten] AD review of draft-ietf-kitten-sasl-saml-ec-19

Robbie Harwood <rharwood@redhat.com> Thu, 10 September 2020 20:51 UTC

Return-Path: <rharwood@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A9E03A0D90 for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:51:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mx_5LadFbsJm for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:51:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A48EB3A0D5D for <kitten@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:51:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1599771061; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=YIWOvtI3fOzHjDPW/H930yNWwUsNMX3KxlWD9G/tDw8=; b=JjQRAmEUkGS3ciEArgb7xAL9U3JkHXT6B4cZ/Bf01bTTiGevUoB73d7Sa0uf5ODlkBsWbz +G25ZQPUpNXIRWO5DPpvpc2MnCnHMA2ENHzbSjA9FEH7VYlH7ha+5mQnYJ5VWAeQIwr3X5 BeGI5peiMG49zd6Jd+3pGXutGzTjLVY=
Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-75-2jjMzNJvMQO65SD1wvtFEA-1; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:50:57 -0400
X-MC-Unique: 2jjMzNJvMQO65SD1wvtFEA-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61BAB7A1CB; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 20:50:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.10.110.34]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFE6481C40; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 20:50:55 +0000 (UTC)
From: Robbie Harwood <rharwood@redhat.com>
To: simon@josefsson.org, "Cantor\, Scott" <cantor.2@osu.edu>, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, "draft-ietf-kitten-sasl-saml-ec\@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-kitten-sasl-saml-ec@ietf.org>
Cc: "kitten\@ietf.org" <kitten@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <D5CD96B0-CC1C-4788-8479-EF77EB1B4263@osu.edu>
References: <20200902230243.GH16914@kduck.mit.edu> <D5CD96B0-CC1C-4788-8479-EF77EB1B4263@osu.edu>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:50:52 -0400
Message-ID: <jlgr1r9xsnn.fsf@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13
Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=rharwood@redhat.com
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0.0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/CoQr_ObpHXMVbnQnlVqW-ttRx7M>
Subject: Re: [kitten] AD review of draft-ietf-kitten-sasl-saml-ec-19
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 20:51:04 -0000

"Cantor, Scott" <cantor.2@osu.edu> writes:

> While I appreciate the detailed review, mostly for my own educational
> purposes, I simply don't have anything close to the cycles it would
> take to redo the document to such a degree. Nobody is funding me to
> work on it, and events have long since overtaken it.
>
> I was hoping that it was more or less close to workable, and it's a
> vast improvement over the clearly-broken SAML and OAuth mechanisms
> that got rubber-stamped a long while back. That mistake is frankly
> what really motivated me at the time to work on it, but that was many
> years ago now.

Appreciate your frankness here.  With my shepherd hat on:

Simon, do you think you have cycles to take this on?

If not, I think we need to find another editor/co-author.

Thanks,
--Robbie