[kitten] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6680 (4337)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sat, 18 April 2015 21:53 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BB9F1A9175 for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 14:53:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y5D6OxcAFT_Z for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 14:53:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 420451A9173 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 14:53:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 7ABFD180206; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 14:52:22 -0700 (PDT)
To: nico@cryptonector.com, leifj@sunet.se, hartmans-ietf@mit.edu, simon@josefsson.org, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie, Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com, mamille2@cisco.com, kaduk@mit.edu
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 6000:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20150418215222.7ABFD180206@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 14:52:22 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/DUFkdx2Iy7ypAV9MXKUos4D5egQ>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 14:56:44 -0700
Cc: kitten@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [kitten] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6680 (4337)
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 21:53:12 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6680, "Generic Security Service Application Programming Interface (GSS-API) Naming Extensions". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6680&eid=4337 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Section: 7.5 Original Text ------------- This function outputs the value(s) associated with a given GSS name object for a given name attribute. Corrected Text -------------- This function outputs the value(s) associated with a given GSS name object for a given name attribute. It is permitted to block pending network interactions when the attr input is not an attribute which would be included in the attrs output of a call to GSS_Inquire_name() on the same name input. Notes ----- RFC 6680 makes no mention of blocking or not blocking on network interaction, though RFC 2743 does. This seems like the most reasonable interpretation of what is currently in RFC 6680. Calls which are not explicitly permitted to block are assumed to be not permitted to block. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6680 (draft-ietf-kitten-gssapi-naming-exts-15) -------------------------------------- Title : Generic Security Service Application Programming Interface (GSS-API) Naming Extensions Publication Date : August 2012 Author(s) : N. Williams, L. Johansson, S. Hartman, S. Josefsson Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Common Authentication Technology Next Generation Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [kitten] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6680 (433… RFC Errata System
- Re: [kitten] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6680 … Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [kitten] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6680 … Sam Hartman
- Re: [kitten] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6680 … Nico Williams
- Re: [kitten] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6680 … Sam Hartman
- Re: [kitten] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6680 … Alejandro Perez Mendez
- Re: [kitten] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6680 … Nico Williams
- Re: [kitten] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6680 … Nico Williams
- [kitten] Non-blocking attribute prefix (Re: [Tech… Nico Williams
- Re: [kitten] Non-blocking attribute prefix (Re: [… Nico Williams
- [kitten] We may need GSS_Get_name_attributes() (p… Nico Williams
- Re: [kitten] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6680 … Sam Hartman
- Re: [kitten] We may need GSS_Get_name_attributes(… Nico Williams
- Re: [kitten] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6680 … Nico Williams
- Re: [kitten] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6680 … Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [kitten] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6680 … Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [kitten] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6680 … Sam Hartman
- Re: [kitten] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6680 … Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [kitten] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6680 … Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [kitten] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6680 … Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [kitten] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6680 … Sam Hartman
- Re: [kitten] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6680 … Nico Williams