IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [kitten] Comments on draft-ietf-krb-wg-camac-08

Tom Yu <tlyu@mit.edu> Thu, 28 August 2014 18:36 UTC

Return-Path: <tlyu@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADFCE1A8954 for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 11:36:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.97
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.97 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7ZAHY3Hai9fn for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 11:36:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-4.mit.edu (dmz-mailsec-scanner-4.mit.edu [18.9.25.15]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59DC11A8952 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 11:36:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 1209190f-f79aa6d000005b45-d8-53ff76b3b1fb
Received: from mailhub-auth-3.mit.edu ( [18.9.21.43]) (using TLS with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-4.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 0B.88.23365.3B67FF35; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 14:36:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-3.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id s7SIaYjg017339; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 14:36:35 -0400
Received: from localhost (sarnath.mit.edu [18.18.1.190]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tlyu@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id s7SIaXKZ019383; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 14:36:34 -0400
From: Tom Yu <tlyu@mit.edu>
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
References: <tslwqax1mhm.fsf@mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 14:36:33 -0400
In-Reply-To: <tslwqax1mhm.fsf@mit.edu> (Sam Hartman's message of "Mon, 28 Jul 2014 12:23:01 -0400")
Message-ID: <ldva96owjf2.fsf@sarnath.mit.edu>
Lines: 9
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrLIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixCmqrbu57H+wwcZpMhZf2x6wWRzdvIrF gcljyZKfTB4rp55mD2CK4rJJSc3JLEst0rdL4Mr48WIJY8E+5orZd3cyNjB+Yupi5OSQEDCR +NL8lRHCFpO4cG89WxcjF4eQwGwmid3PnzFDOBsZJY58/cgC4bxhlLh9eCsbSAubgLTE8cu7 wEaJCKhLrL40iR3EZhYQlTi37ggriC0sYCPxZvd8MFtIQFVi36PnYL0sQPb5Kb/AejkFUiV2 3mliAbF5BXQl3nyeDDaHR4BDYu+dE6wQcUGJkzOfsEDM15K48e8l0wRGgVlIUrOQpBYwMq1i lE3JrdLNTczMKU5N1i1OTszLSy3SNdHLzSzRS00p3cQIDklJ/h2M3w4qHWIU4GBU4uGdkfAv WIg1say4MvcQoyQHk5Io7/a8/8FCfEn5KZUZicUZ8UWlOanFhxglOJiVRHj3lQLleFMSK6tS i/JhUtIcLErivG+trYKFBNITS1KzU1MLUotgsjIcHEoSvHdBGgWLUtNTK9Iyc0oQ0kwcnCDD eYCG7wEbXlyQmFucmQ6RP8Woy9HS9LaXSYglLz8vVUqc9ypIkQBIUUZpHtwcWCp5xSgO9JYw 7ymQKh5gGoKb9ApoCRPQkl8df0GWlCQipKQaGL3lUu3UTj8QkJXzrLmd4dHQ9iU+qoL9QM3+ kGyLZ7vZ8hR8Beyq5HfM/Fd0W7TFhU/IQnDmhl3zROuL16Wvy7ny11CXNbkwb0nXuvdBDTph sZebPX8W6uTleD5ZcPqK7lzPqdzbXhXns57NPRocuPPyda2ZAbozssOzLn/JY3/85lPaLFFl JZbijERDLeai4kQAznI0+AADAAA=
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/DnsKLHrz38ezZJ0RkPnigMCjCao
Cc: kitten@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [kitten] Comments on draft-ietf-krb-wg-camac-08
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 18:36:39 -0000

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@MIT.EDU> writes:

> My recommendation is that we move the authorization data registry from
> Kerberos IANA to section 6 here and remove section 5.
> I feel reasonably strongly that publishing this document without either
> an IETF consumer or an IANA registry is bad.

I believe the recently revived draft-jain-kitten-krb-auth-indicator-01
should satisfy your "IETF consumer" requirement, if the WG adopts it.

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status