Re: [kitten] Review of draft-ietf-kitten-channel-bound-flag-04

Luke Howard <lukeh@padl.com> Tue, 19 February 2019 12:29 UTC

Return-Path: <lukeh@padl.com>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74BE4130ED4 for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 04:29:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=padl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d-HrR0egbhNV for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 04:29:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from us.padl.com (us.padl.com [216.154.215.154]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74EB9130ECA for <kitten@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 04:29:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by us.padl.com with ESMTP id x1JCSna1027563; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 12:28:53 GMT
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 us.padl.com x1JCSna1027563
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=padl.com; s=default; t=1550579334; bh=bIvpZYTjZ57rLSbwyDNLDGYh6ry8yE+fnEGcfasuE38=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References:From; b=lMa8LJXoljY7pKsb8VbH+LZ0dROqgIdmVot7W+UBDRFgcXR9T0HG4+IjpXXQsqsh8 ReGePozuhpRMlXywGRLluAZx+0ZVYz7ne9S80SJA750c7yE6+lqlVE1Z/q5OlR3z+O 4/8o9c8KBFBSfX4Dh4rkWsc7Jxt+b9UewT49ZemomLWkfIdApgJbvDWnK/7VoDDLtv YVmWWS7QWUiCFTAIonMmdtDLy3Dldko2Dq88/9jGNYLKila6pfJfiXTyW2+m52eRpX GbEsPbOcOkUp7ItULbEpX+2HpBlHCjzDhZ0NC1KBBAqgYg2DwL/ZfGMV8aAVwf5lz1 YuO5N+N7GvPfQ==
From: Luke Howard <lukeh@padl.com>
Message-Id: <89D5C410-8D5A-4699-B489-953F4FE65F87@padl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_61A5A4E6-C141-4352-931D-B5C5E0F09FB3"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 13:29:03 +0100
In-Reply-To: <tslbm38vl8h.fsf@suchdamage.org>
Cc: "kitten@ietf.org" <kitten@ietf.org>
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
References: <tslbm38vl8h.fsf@suchdamage.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/IMTpK0RUhC_AQfgUJYyI5Skkp7Y>
Subject: Re: [kitten] Review of draft-ietf-kitten-channel-bound-flag-04
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 12:29:12 -0000

> On 18 Feb 2019, at 10:29 pm, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> wrote:
> 
> * Please get review from multiple implementors before standardizing the
> create_context stuff.  In particular, do you want to take inputs like a
> credential and/or a flag indicating the context is for initiation or
> acceptor.  If yo,u've gotten review including from folks like Luke and
> they are happy, then this is great.  It seems good for API users at
> least.


gss_create_sec_context() and gss_set_context_flags() could be subsumed into gss_set_sec_context_option() which is supported by both Heimdal and MIT. But perhaps not as easy to use for the caller.