IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [kitten] taking on new work?

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Wed, 05 April 2017 20:59 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C0941270A0 for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 13:59:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.296
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.296 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.796, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UhktsB99jg7W for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 13:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a106.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 790C9128DF3 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 13:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a106.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a106.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1328230002928; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 13:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=E4ThNC0XfLlnvS SZR0Gq9Izqheo=; b=NiRIfevZPPP058qVH2cR9icnKUZ0YekYPQd3kMwsksZNpf OhDCPBUxCTebNYgJIEsawmbNzk6Wy26yCu1OBinvUJePfecRcW5ZTbl3HRsQxDFv NnbFfQ66w5a/HZASfEOVpjLoq+7WZRtW55i0G/veGtaQLndZrIz8jJvQiKD38=
Received: from localhost (gzac12-mdf2-1.aoa.twosigma.com [208.77.215.155]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a106.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AA16830002925; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 13:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 15:59:12 -0500
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Cc: kitten@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20170405205912.GG4004@localhost>
References: <20170405045550.GJ30306@kduck.kaduk.org> <20170405191034.GF4004@localhost> <20170405192646.GO30306@kduck.kaduk.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170405192646.GO30306@kduck.kaduk.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/Q67UBN3mPndoY0U9ufUSlb__DHc>
Subject: Re: [kitten] taking on new work?
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 20:59:17 -0000

On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 02:26:46PM -0500, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 02:10:35PM -0500, Nico Williams wrote:
> > For me the highest priority areas would be:
> > 
> >  - AEAD (i.e., performance)
> > 
> >  - krb5-extra-rt (i.e., better user experience)
> > 
> >  - GSS naming attributes (first, because I need them, and secondly
> >    because I see others adding features that should be added as name
> >    attributes, but not doing it as name attributes, and that complicates
> >    my universe because I really want to pass around NAMEs or exported
> >    composite name tokens rather than security contexts)
> > 
> >  - We actually need to fix the Java bindings of GSS to say that GSSName
> >    implements Principal (that's a long story)
> 
> but maybe you could narrow it down to a top two?

I'll take any two of the above that others also want to work on.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email