Re: [kitten] RFC2743 errata 4251

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Mon, 15 December 2014 23:07 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A3BC1A6F9C for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 15:07:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.666
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.666 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 99d2yqAM3NVS for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 15:07:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a89.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB831A6F90 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 15:07:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a89.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a89.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9FD631805D; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 15:07:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=5+QsnP0Ony2zYb SymawWHxasgMM=; b=FgICR71S14Yr+BqoZhp/4uIxa7DhbJSAMS1J70yw2Go9Co gkEIEeNu4a22LbbigeYXHk367V0kvwEk54adGc14S8XXJkrN851UuQHUckZbMSJQ 9AGxRIpHSGUpBpADb1ZLMsCRdO37u/17HSYYWwKqjolZ9qknEbw401zEwUHMs=
Received: from localhost (108-207-244-174.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.207.244.174]) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a89.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8937331805C; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 15:07:24 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 17:07:24 -0600
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Martin Rex <mrex@sap.com>
Message-ID: <20141215230719.GM3241@localhost>
References: <20141215175033.GF3241@localhost> <20141215215231.EF6F31B085@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20141215215231.EF6F31B085@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/QRYimqbNCJhynCMzIQ007okiR7s
Cc: kitten@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [kitten] RFC2743 errata 4251
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 23:07:26 -0000

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:52:31PM +0100, Martin Rex wrote:
> Nico Williams wrote:
> >> (To be clear: saying that applications must eventually call
> >> GSS_Delete_sec_context() is fine; saying that they should do so
> >> immediately after a GSS_S_COMPLETE from GSS_Process_context_token() is
> >> not fine.)
> > 
> > GSS-APIv2u1 callers can still call GSS_Unwrap(), GSS_VerifyMIC(), and
> > GSS_Pseudo_random()[*], and even GSS_Wrap() and GSS_GetMIC() before
> > calling GSS_Delete_sec_context(), however,
> 
> You mean calling GSS_Unwrap(), GSS_VerifyMIC(), GSS_Wrap()
> GSS_GetMIC() _after_ calling GSS_Delete_sec_context() ?

No, after calling GSS_Process_context_token().