Re: [kitten] [nfsv4] draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcsec-gssv3: request for review

[Nico Williams <[e-mail]>]

On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 04:01:15PM -0400, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Aug 2014, Nico Williams wrote:
> >"Compound" is used as an adjective in all cases.  I don't see how
> >"compound authentication" (or "compound context handle", ...) is
> >confusable with "compound RPC".  But this isn't important enough to me;
> >aligning the terminology with AFS' rxgk is.  Ben, what does rxgk call
> >this?
> 
> If I remember correclty from the talk from Toronto, Andy was not
> quite so keen to align with rxgk, but that may have been based on
> incomplete data.

Well, it'd be nice to have that, but it isn't required.  rxgk's use of
"combine" is very specific to what it does, which is very different from
what RPCSEC_GSSv3 does in specifics though effectively the same, so
perhaps alignment with rxgk as to terminology would not be usefule
anyways.