IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [kitten] Requesting WG adoption of several SCRAM related documents

Robbie Harwood <rharwood@redhat.com> Thu, 11 November 2021 16:09 UTC

Return-Path: <rharwood@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 456C03A0AB5 for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 08:09:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WpImUXJmjLi0 for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 08:09:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E04803A0AB1 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 08:09:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1636646947; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=PS2Z9P1JrKXdYYradHyFUZ/DSIbEkmrvFpwdiC5yqDo=; b=gS1MUfksDG1w98wQBgPP8ar2l1ayhlzTyy/gtkGqZlXqrgmHqj6w4EFjTdWygj8M7c3i/a bW2fTHv824uwzgKpqH6EOHMVmcyUq4bHBF0Z8Qk0T8UO8hWJtqLjttY5pEm0lWXShqJEyt +Yongau1d87SC/YcfUHzVASd+9lS8oo=
Received: from mail-qv1-f71.google.com (mail-qv1-f71.google.com [209.85.219.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-292-X2npGWDGOlKfDshdkFXwmQ-1; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 11:09:06 -0500
X-MC-Unique: X2npGWDGOlKfDshdkFXwmQ-1
Received: by mail-qv1-f71.google.com with SMTP id kk1-20020a056214508100b003a9d1b987caso5899962qvb.4 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 08:09:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=8MZ8kd2qQwTKzVkamtnu6Y1GMHxaXsHrB8KRtGKm+6Q=; b=E3CT4Uo4/eA9xKVFcxm82G+WckErrqr/aDCU4W1YHkyXt+E9I1YE3FIUvZQS4e3nxJ Zy2xmxPeJeqRXaLImr+oh+o51H6HhNSjDrQQmqdv0SCdaIONCJN31mWhZxD91hA8wp+5 EXKeHNzEexYfwfuNvvji531qgkGmcNx+iCNgSVnO1U4nAYWMCGmYuEbvfo9Wv4cuR+8W f8HPbts52bSIeFetZbjTsUl9S9d69zhMwEmGwpteVLU8Wd/mC4sI4y+zUSftqEpW+Jg+ LjdOudGyGBIPbdKnk7O6P+2oR6cYXnqUF07AFZbc7WZmkLgVbZsuEhedxoHskGVBSSCT oVCg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530+SPHGuNEiMdYYepSDJapBbrUwqX7a+7568zy0BeN5MixSMcOu pICCqPaO6y4BaLRLcvIcO13CoVbQAoxtIkf/oW/FXf1JJ7fxt7OKudQWXsK6AhxsfvMJgUdSSNl nfl9z0gc=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:24ce:: with SMTP id m14mr6848673qkn.212.1636646945706; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 08:09:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyNu4orTiqT12aMinPRVLT2xH+RgrsCqPDgcvZD//dcb2UoChGmkbvfV/ook8dHhjTKxo1txw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:24ce:: with SMTP id m14mr6848634qkn.212.1636646945353; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 08:09:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([2601:184:4181:74c0:862e:5809:ed9e:e10e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m16sm1775720qtx.46.2021.11.11.08.09.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 11 Nov 2021 08:09:04 -0800 (PST)
From: Robbie Harwood <rharwood@redhat.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, Sam Whited <sam@samwhited.com>, KITTEN Working Group <kitten@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <ed2cbbaf-98bc-ea16-8c48-b3ddb02c845a@isode.com>
References: <jlgpmrhi189.fsf@redhat.com> <139AC3E2-92B1-433A-A8AE-28C7DECFB619@josefsson.org> <72bf2b21-86db-4975-ab8f-b367d863f1f0@www.fastmail.com> <ed2cbbaf-98bc-ea16-8c48-b3ddb02c845a@isode.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 11:09:01 -0500
Message-ID: <jlgpmr6ad42.fsf@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=rharwood@redhat.com
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/Uwlw8A4rjXc9B1AMYmGx9LRFmdg>
Subject: Re: [kitten] Requesting WG adoption of several SCRAM related documents
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 16:09:13 -0000

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> writes:

> So my update proposal is to work on the following in the WG:
>
> 1) SCRAM 2FA extension
>
> 2) Something like draft-cridland-kitten-clientkey for SASL 
> re-authentication that can be used with SCRAM or similar mechanisms
>
> 3) A possible informational document about best SASL implementation 
> practices, in particular how to deal with some SASL mechanisms only 
> being available for some users.

Does anyone have thoughts on this modified proposal?  (I'm trying to
judge consensus, so please speak up.)

Be well,
--Robbie

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email