IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [kitten] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-kitten-tls-channel-bindings-for-tls13-09

Sam Whited <sam@samwhited.com> Fri, 15 October 2021 13:41 UTC

Return-Path: <sam@samwhited.com>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 807FA3A0817; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 06:41:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.801
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.801 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=samwhited.com header.b=QDusvGd0; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=llmK7op7
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pWVPC3rKObm9; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 06:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACCDD3A081F; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 06:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BE295C005D; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 09:41:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap42 ([10.202.2.92]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 15 Oct 2021 09:41:45 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=samwhited.com; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :cc:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=fm1; bh=gT TGPcNkDwNIZ4n6jKaDylj9MGcRnQRCSXy4GUD4yvA=; b=QDusvGd0ILQSCAgz89 iesHkTVVHy7AsLvzxbhCIPT8Uh+aGUq08nQILV7oKQDP42KzNjdjtaBiuuvhpkRQ Ykryia2NkrPXj/Ls7y5mcVHvDjqU79q3GxFUDdLl+IFCobCMKkqmP2o4GjE9d3bt baXptzUfOoISV+/Q4ZaTQKGuXg/XI3PdsVm3YaER1VvkfzPKaqmRRMWBSMMZHzq4 DeQq5R/DQuv6U6AED/hop04dcQtWj4sTAluxV4/dEPGVQzGNhFhN3AUB2lk5AMbP A9apNkAzoH/LW5WHhWetCbACt2Ab9uqjmp5/NSQPsYe1ywn0e5p5Uf2HiiNowSYR zWqg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=gTTGPcNkDwNIZ4n6jKaDylj9MGcRnQRCSXy4GUD4y vA=; b=llmK7op7ic+W61/rVQ3fhBSpCoGkSW27U1ieH3w+OCnkGSBn68pQBXANK LKL1aK6LclI2DT91tT4f80WYs/lO48GRfR077C/3i6D7ZKw13FRwKYrGrX/BYuZD jb277gX7QGLDwJzICmhlI0rGiqp/Xn/qnsTNBm65gVIYMOjsVvb1MYIsT/FenNoP Xb0t9bna3adMh4t32XVliGXX1T6//qKFUOszbVYKCpOE0uPvS325rZmhbN8LKBgK Kp2w2mzc1YK5qYuo8Ptu7JO8BNO4NRphFK1uH21hSThRIr5UQEQndmBu3TZY7Ubk 9wcbSNUizB/K3s8qrvVXSl02vdoRg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:GIVpYcy9lZuJqRMhIAT_kE-Y1VQy4Dlg6qqtRriOab2r-uP67D5dGw> <xme:GIVpYQQ0Te9uNUJMyzkSYYRsJuy6fJ7R0Txn8LzljWM-NbSY_Y_dGLXQucigRS5Rl 5zyuS30pMNY0piayw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrvddugedgieeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgfgsehtqhertderreejnecuhfhrohhmpedfufgr mhcuhghhihhtvggufdcuoehsrghmsehsrghmfihhihhtvggurdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpeelgfdttdevueffudeivdefieekgeeftedvleehhfetfeejveegvdeljefh tdehfeenucffohhmrghinheprhhftgdqvgguihhtohhrrdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrh fuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepshgrmhesshgrmhifhhhithgv ugdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:GIVpYeUVq6M3VHpCAqPBkF2HJXUDbTtkZXO3Jw21WzqkXmLyRKXJ1Q> <xmx:GIVpYah8g2_kXAaTpzkOU4uSzwA73JdGugTNKiZd4BsnidjnHIZT1A> <xmx:GIVpYeDHHnSGIv8F7A57MRJXKoJf3jpcB8Zb3xWOEZZMc-tKhyYzRA> <xmx:GYVpYZPATr9GG_zBaH9WD0rbhfOqu4yv_y3E4dya-xlsWBiQN5kwdg>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id CEF0B2180078; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 09:41:44 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-1345-g8441cd7852-fm-20211006.001-g8441cd78
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <76baf740-44ac-48c9-8c78-bd36fcb5ee48@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <PR3P193MB1070CF0B74981CAF46C38739F9B89@PR3P193MB1070.EURP193.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <163415374625.30942.884569969141527344@ietfa.amsl.com> <PR3P193MB1070CF0B74981CAF46C38739F9B89@PR3P193MB1070.EURP193.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 09:41:24 -0400
From: "Sam Whited" <sam@samwhited.com>
To: "Ludovic BOCQUET" <ludo_bocquet@hotmail.com>, "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org>, "Niclas Comstedt" <nco@comstedt.net>
Cc: "KITTEN Working Group" <kitten@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-kitten-tls-channel-bindings-for-tls13.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-kitten-tls-channel-bindings-for-tls13.all@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/Vih638sSw3VHXkk4HE7FNYnqHaY>
Subject: Re: [kitten] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-kitten-tls-channel-bindings-for-tls13-09
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 13:41:51 -0000

As I've mentioned before to you, I don't believe it updates this
document in any way as the statement about unique master secrets in that
document is still true either way and does not need to be modified. I'm
not against adding this if others also agree, but I just don't see it.

Maybe you could propose some text for how you think it updates 7677 or
where you think a reference to 7677 would be appropriate and that would
make things more clear?

—Sam

On Thu, Oct 14, 2021, at 18:12, Ludovic BOCQUET wrote:
> It is possible to add in "Updates": 7677?
>
> In the text too?
>
> And at the bottom:
>
> [RFC7677]  Tony Hansen,              "SCRAM-SHA-256 and SCRAM-SHA-256-
> PLUS Simple              Authentication and Security Layer (SASL)
> Mechanisms",              RFC7677, DOI 10.17487/RFC7677, November
> 2015,              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7677>.
>
> Thanks in advance.

-- 
Sam Whited

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email