[kitten] kitten work queue

Robbie Harwood <rharwood@redhat.com> Thu, 29 August 2019 22:07 UTC

Return-Path: <rharwood@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A14EC120BCA for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 15:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hVn8mDocls8N for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 15:07:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64AEA12091B for <kitten@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 15:07:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13F713082E66 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 22:07:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (dhcp-10-20-1-130.bss.redhat.com [10.20.1.130]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEE4960BE1 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 22:07:12 +0000 (UTC)
From: Robbie Harwood <rharwood@redhat.com>
To: kitten@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 18:07:19 -0400
Message-ID: <jlgef13zkvc.fsf@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.46]); Thu, 29 Aug 2019 22:07:13 +0000 (UTC)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/WFYW_CGQq--GKfCQfOm2DLLUOw8>
Subject: [kitten] kitten work queue
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 22:07:18 -0000

Hello kitten, time for more administrivia.

I have advanced draft-ietf-kitten-sasl-saml-ec as shepherd, so it seems
like a good time to examine the documents we're tracking.  The documents
currently in our purview from last year are, by state:

# Published document:
    - rfc8636 (formerly draft-ietf-kitten-pkinit-alg-agility)

# Submitted:
    - sasl-saml-ec (as of today)
    - krb-spake-preauth (awaiting CFRG draft decisions)

# Waiting on updates from authors:
    - channel-bound-flag (needs redesign and implementation updates)

# Waiting on additional reviews (just mail your review to the list):
    - gssapi-extensions-iana:
      https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-kitten-gssapi-extensions-iana-11 
    - kerberos-iana-registries:
      https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-kitten-kerberos-iana-registries-04
    - krb-service-discovery:
      https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-kitten-krb-service-discovery-00

# Parked:
    - kerberos-iana-registries (I was unable to contact Taylor, so this
      needs an editor or possibly an author)

# Dead & abandoned:
    - iakerb (no protocol adoption or working group interest)

If there is an item on the list you consider important which someone
else wrote, please review it if you have not.

We also need people to shepherd documents: if you're willing to review a
document, it's not much more work to shepherd it (just writing your
review in the proper format and making sure authors reply to any
feedback).  Please reach out if you'd like to shepherd any of these
(chair hat off: especially krb-service-discovery, because I can't
shepherd that one).

Additionally, if there are any I-Ds we should adopt, or that you're
willing to spend time on writing, feel free to discuss that downthread.

Thanks,
--Robbie