Re: [kitten] sasl-saml-ec-18: bookkeeping changes requested

[Benjamin Kaduk <[e-mail]>]

On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 03:36:54PM +0000, Cantor, Scott wrote:
> > Could you please address these and resubmit?
> 
> This is done. I decided to go ahead and merge the reference sections, I don't think maintaining the split adds enough value to be arguing with anybody over it.
> 
> All of the RFC updates were obvious, save for one. I did move the TLS 1.2 client authn reference to TLS 1.3, but I hesitated because that's really a conformance/interop sort of consideration, and TLS 1.2 client authn is not the same as 1.3 and is definitely not the same from a ubiquity / interop point of view. But given that the number of implementations of this is and will always be very small, I decided to be forward looking and just rev it.

That's a fair decision to make; I'll just note for future reference that we
do have a fair number of documents getting published that reference both
5246 and 8446 by virtue of needing to interact with the bits that have
different semantics between TLS versions.

-Ben