Re: [kitten] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-hansen-scram-sha256-01.txt

Shawn M Emery <shawn.emery@oracle.com> Fri, 08 August 2014 07:02 UTC

Return-Path: <shawn.emery@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B22421A03AC for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 00:02:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SOI-TDUA5aNA for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 00:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from userp1040.oracle.com (userp1040.oracle.com [156.151.31.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4157C1A036B for <kitten@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 00:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id s7872BRZ005599 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for <kitten@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 07:02:12 GMT
Received: from aserz7022.oracle.com (aserz7022.oracle.com [141.146.126.231]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s7872BGg017328 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <kitten@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 07:02:11 GMT
Received: from abhmp0016.oracle.com (abhmp0016.oracle.com [141.146.116.22]) by aserz7022.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s7872BFk017319 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 07:02:11 GMT
Received: from [10.154.154.235] (/10.154.154.235) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 00:02:10 -0700
Message-ID: <53E47603.3080302@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 01:02:27 -0600
From: Shawn M Emery <shawn.emery@oracle.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; SunOS i86pc; rv:17.0) Gecko/20140508 Thunderbird/17.0.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "kitten@ietf.org" <kitten@ietf.org>
References: <20140724224956.3620.25084.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <53D18F6F.1060204@att.com>
In-Reply-To: <53D18F6F.1060204@att.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030406010409060805010009"
X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/a76KZYwgTX7exx9EId0dfKumrH8
Subject: Re: [kitten] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-hansen-scram-sha256-01.txt
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 07:02:16 -0000

On 7/24/14 4:57 PM, Tony Hansen wrote:
> I just posted this update to the document I circulated back in April, 
> registering SCRAM-SHA-256 as a SASL mechanism.
>
> I added Minimum iteration-count and OID to the registration form for 
> SCRAM-* registrations.
>
> I kept the minimum iteration count for SCRAM-SHA-256 set at 4096. This 
> should probably be discussed further.

I know RFC 3962 calls for 4096 rounds for SHA-1.  I haven't heard of 
anything that would make us want to change this.  Are there specific 
use-cases for this mechanism that would be negatively affected when 
choosing a higher iteration or is there guidance on policies when using 
this number of iterations or lower?

> One question I have for this: would it be worth change SCRAM 
> registrations to Expert Review in place of IETF review?

Do you envision a number of future mechanisms under the SCRAM* family?  
If not then I would prefer leaving it as IETF review.

> There was discussion in the HTTPAUTH working group this morning, 
> asking about the use of SHA2 as an HTTP mechanism instead of the SHA1 
> being discussed in Alexey's draft.
>
> An open question is whether this could/should become a working group 
> draft. I am happy with it being handled either that way or keeping it 
> an individual AD-sponsored draft. (I've already spoken with Steven and 
> Kathleen about that possibility.)

Speaking as co-chair; it has been a strain on the WG's resources with 
getting through the previous and current set of SASL work items.  So my 
initial position on this would be to have this draft AD-sponsored.

Shawn.
--
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: 	I-D Action: draft-hansen-scram-sha256-01.txt
> Date: 	Thu, 24 Jul 2014 15:49:56 -0700
> From: 	internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Reply-To: 	internet-drafts@ietf.org
> To: 	i-d-announce@ietf.org
>
>
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>
>
>          Title           : SCRAM-SHA-256 and SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS SASL Mechanisms
>          Author          : Tony Hansen
> 	Filename        : draft-hansen-scram-sha256-01.txt
> 	Pages           : 5
> 	Date            : 2014-07-24
>
> Abstract:
>     This document registers the SASL mechanisms SCRAM-SHA-256 and SCRAM-
>     SHA-256-PLUS.  It also updates RFC 5802 in minor ways.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hansen-scram-sha256/
>
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hansen-scram-sha256-01
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-hansen-scram-sha256-01
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kitten mailing list
> Kitten@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten