[kitten] Consensus Calls

Shawn Emery <shawn.emery@oracle.com> Wed, 15 May 2013 07:28 UTC

Return-Path: <shawn.emery@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2BDB21F8D7A for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2013 00:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.299, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dc69ytaLyaYB for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2013 00:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from userp1040.oracle.com (userp1040.oracle.com [156.151.31.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 367AA21F8D31 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 May 2013 00:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ucsinet21.oracle.com (ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id r4F7SVp7006475 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for <kitten@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 May 2013 07:28:32 GMT
Received: from aserz7022.oracle.com (aserz7022.oracle.com [141.146.126.231]) by ucsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4F7SWBF009139 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <kitten@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 May 2013 07:28:32 GMT
Received: from abhmt114.oracle.com (abhmt114.oracle.com [141.146.116.66]) by aserz7022.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4F7SVnq016128 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 May 2013 07:28:31 GMT
Received: from [10.159.109.119] (/10.159.109.119) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 15 May 2013 00:28:31 -0700
Message-ID: <519338F5.3030006@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 01:27:49 -0600
From: Shawn Emery <shawn.emery@oracle.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; SunOS i86pc; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "kitten@ietf.org" <kitten@ietf.org>
References: <51927692.1090007@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <51927692.1090007@oracle.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <51927692.1090007@oracle.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090104010106040304090708"
X-Source-IP: ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93]
Subject: [kitten] Consensus Calls
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 07:28:41 -0000

The WG is making the following consensus calls (which were formulated 
from the interim meeting held on May 6th):

1. In regards to draft-ietf-kitten-sasl-oauth,RFC 6616, and RFC 6595;do 
we allow for GS2 mechanisms that don't providemutual authentication? 
This would entail changing the GS2 specification (RFC 5801) to relax 
this constraint.

a. Yes
b. No
c. Don't careor need more information

2. Do we allow the IAKERB draft (draft-ietf-kitten-iakerb) to pull in 
the finished message text from the PKU2U draft (draft-zhu-pku2u)?  
Subsequently, if the PKU2U draftis progressed, it will make a normative 
reference to the IAKERB draft.

a. Yes
b. No
c. Don't careor need more information

3. In regards todraft-williams-kitten-channel-bound-flag; are you in 
favor of using the NULL contextsolution for the channel bound 
indicatoras opposed to a new set credential API?

a. Yes
b. No
c. Don't careor need more information

Please provide your input before May 29th.Thank you.

Shawn Emery.
kitten co-chair
--