Re: [kitten] WGLC for three "bis" documents: draft-ietf-kitten-rfc4402bis-00, draft-ietf-kitten-rfc5653bis-01, draft-ietf-kitten-rfc6112bis-00

Weijun Wang <weijun.wang@oracle.com> Thu, 05 February 2015 05:35 UTC

Return-Path: <weijun.wang@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E03B11A01D6 for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 21:35:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id smkLXiELxFFx for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 21:35:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from userp1040.oracle.com (userp1040.oracle.com [156.151.31.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C9321A0072 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 21:35:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ucsinet21.oracle.com (ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id t155ZnkR016614 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 5 Feb 2015 05:35:49 GMT
Received: from userz7022.oracle.com (userz7022.oracle.com [156.151.31.86]) by ucsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t155ZmTN007247 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 5 Feb 2015 05:35:49 GMT
Received: from ubhmt106.oracle.com (ubhmt106.oracle.com [156.151.24.11]) by userz7022.oracle.com (8.14.5+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t155ZmfZ007619; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 05:35:48 GMT
Received: from [192.168.10.107] (/123.122.155.79) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 21:35:47 -0800
Message-ID: <54D30130.6040707@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 13:35:44 +0800
From: Weijun Wang <weijun.wang@oracle.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
References: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1501201753140.23489@multics.mit.edu> <54CE9F5B.9070808@mit.edu> <54CEE8E5.5080701@oracle.com> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1502021122260.23489@multics.mit.edu> <54D029B3.3050003@oracle.com> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1502050012470.3953@multics.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1502050012470.3953@multics.mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Source-IP: ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/cCby-7eIG0kxTtpVlL8NHc1Trt8>
Cc: kitten@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [kitten] WGLC for three "bis" documents: draft-ietf-kitten-rfc4402bis-00, draft-ietf-kitten-rfc5653bis-01, draft-ietf-kitten-rfc6112bis-00
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 05:35:52 -0000


On 2/5/2015 13:14, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Feb 2015, Weijun Wang wrote:
>
>> But the xml2rfc tool claims
>>
>>     No boilerplate text available for ipr: 'full2026'.  Acceptable values are:
>> trust200902, noModificationTrust200902, noDerivativesTrust200902,
>> pre5378Trust200902, trust200811, noModificationTrust200811,
>> noDerivativesTrust200811
>
> The standalone tool for local use, or http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/ ?  I think
> that at least at one point, they had slightly different behavior.

Local, but the web tool also shows the same error. In fact, there is a 
box on the web page explaining several ipr values (4 flavors of 
trust200902) and "pre5378Trust200902" seems to be the correct one since 
the initial RFC for JGSS-API (RFC 2478) was submitted in June 2000.

>
>> I decide to choose "pre5378Trust200902". The output text is almost identical
>> to that of RFC 5653, but adding these lines which I think is harmless
>>
>>         Code Components extracted from this document must
>>     include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
>>     the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
>>     described in the Simplified BSD License.
>
> That may be good enough; we can call out the difference in the shepherd
> report and/or RFC Editor note if needed.

I am waiting for feedback from Greg, and after that I'll post -02 draft.

Thanks
Weijun

>
> -Ben
>