Re: [kitten] Progressing draft-ietf-kitten-pkinit-freshness

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Wed, 09 November 2016 04:19 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F6D6129575; Tue, 8 Nov 2016 20:19:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f60CJ9dPj_Ea; Tue, 8 Nov 2016 20:19:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-6.mit.edu (dmz-mailsec-scanner-6.mit.edu [18.7.68.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36885129550; Tue, 8 Nov 2016 20:19:21 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: 12074423-e27ff70000005914-e8-5822a3c38672
Received: from mailhub-auth-3.mit.edu ( [18.9.21.43]) (using TLS with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 1D.4F.22804.3C3A2285; Tue, 8 Nov 2016 23:19:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-3.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id uA94JFbq007130; Tue, 8 Nov 2016 23:19:15 -0500
Received: from kduck.kaduk.org (24-107-191-124.dhcp.stls.mo.charter.com [24.107.191.124]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id uA94JB1F006452 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 8 Nov 2016 23:19:14 -0500
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 22:19:11 -0600
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Message-ID: <20161109041910.GY91607@kduck.kaduk.org>
References: <76e9a2a6-bc56-c9d2-ce03-2de89970ae44@cs.tcd.ie>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <76e9a2a6-bc56-c9d2-ce03-2de89970ae44@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrFIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixCmqrXt0sVKEwbb5XBZXV3UwWhzdvIrF Yvrea+wOzB5ru6+yeSxZ8pMpgCmKyyYlNSezLLVI3y6BK+Pg269MBVOYKq5MPMvYwHiJsYuR k0NCwESia3YHO4gtJNDGJLFmOVCcC8jewCjxu/0hM4RzhUni8sVjYFUsAioS6/evYAWx2YDs hu7LzCC2iIC+xN7N58BqmAViJSaemsMGYgsLuEicnrgDqIaDgxdo24+mWohlNhJ31k4GK+cV EJQ4OfMJC0SrlsSNfy+ZQMqZBaQllv/jAAlzCthKbFy3G2yTqICyRMOMB8wTGAVmIemehaR7 FkL3AkbmVYyyKblVurmJmTnFqcm6xcmJeXmpRbpmermZJXqpKaWbGEHByu6ivIPxZZ/3IUYB DkYlHt6Mh4oRQqyJZcWVuYcYJTmYlER5e2cpRQjxJeWnVGYkFmfEF5XmpBYfYpTgYFYS4RWa C5TjTUmsrEotyodJSXOwKInz/nf7Gi4kkJ5YkpqdmlqQWgSTleHgUJLg/bgIqFGwKDU9tSIt M6cEIc3EwQkynAdouPBikOHFBYm5xZnpEPlTjLoc7za/e8AkxJKXn5cqJc7LDjJIAKQoozQP bg4oyUhk7695xSgO9JYw71+QKh5ggoKb9ApoCRPQkqoYBZAlJYkIKakGRo/q+E+ykSvWrsxS vnV/xlKVok6v243GK0/ElV1pKDlk//v5O7mPm8PMODVkLk/zui9VujY79HB6Dc/en4xsN47x XzEwu3xQ9bdG+S5L8cOWX6pe7ZfO+7JOLESssu5PwOZ/NqJlThbLYpKP/514d75T3SI5Zaui 9HPfT+bLWOkt4gn+nOCbq8RSnJFoqMVcVJwIAGRUup8NAwAA
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/d28CBssUrrEPG_yWXZz6ir8v4kg>
Cc: "kitten@ietf.org" <kitten@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-kitten-pkinit-freshness@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [kitten] Progressing draft-ietf-kitten-pkinit-freshness
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2016 04:19:22 -0000

On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 12:04:43PM +0000, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> 
> Hiya,
> 
> I didn't see any changes being needed after the IETF LC
> for this, but please correct me if I missed something.

Yup, I think we just had a couple of potential RFC Editor notes.

-Ben