Re: [kitten] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6680 (4337)

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Wed, 22 April 2015 17:59 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E881ACEA2 for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:59:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bOTDu_W4GAN0 for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:59:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com (mail.painless-security.com [23.30.188.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFEE11ACE95 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:59:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B994B206AE; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:58:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.suchdamage.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ch51Raer8E0T; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:58:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (c-50-177-26-195.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [50.177.26.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:58:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 32BEA87E88; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:59:28 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@MIT.EDU>
References: <20150418215222.7ABFD180206@rfc-editor.org> <4268E41F-712E-425D-B514-C0023D311462@gmail.com> <tsl7ft7zx9f.fsf@mit.edu> <20150419230843.GP13041@localhost> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1504201355350.22210@multics.mit.edu> <tslr3rewu53.fsf@mit.edu> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1504221346180.22210@multics.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:59:28 -0400
In-Reply-To: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1504221346180.22210@multics.mit.edu> (Benjamin Kaduk's message of "Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:50:31 -0400 (EDT)")
Message-ID: <tsl1tjct56n.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/hEunPR2klNZU5pognc8sPVa6o2o>
Cc: "kitten@ietf.org" <kitten@ietf.org>, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@MIT.EDU>, "leifj@sunet.se" <leifj@sunet.se>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [kitten] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6680 (4337)
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:59:50 -0000

I'm fine with the new comment, but I'd recommend marking approved.
We can still do the update